2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1618/5/052072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a fluid structure interaction tool based on an actuator line model

Abstract: In the present paper the methodology and the procedures for the implicit coupling of an Actuator Line (AL) aerodynamic code with a beam like structural code for the analysis of wind turbine rotors are detailed. Results from benchmark aeroelastic simulations of canonical inflow conditions, comparing the newly developed AL model against a standard Blade Element Momentum (BEM) model are presented in the paper. The two models provide very similar results in simple, uniform inflow, axisymmetric flow cases. The adva… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MaPFlow has been validated in pure aerodynamic analyses against experimental measurements and other computational tools [28]. The same holds for hGAST when coupled with BEM and vortex type aerodynamic models [28,55]. In the present work, the coupled hGAST/MaPFlow tool is validated.…”
Section: The Structural Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MaPFlow has been validated in pure aerodynamic analyses against experimental measurements and other computational tools [28]. The same holds for hGAST when coupled with BEM and vortex type aerodynamic models [28,55]. In the present work, the coupled hGAST/MaPFlow tool is validated.…”
Section: The Structural Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In the present work, the coupled hGAST/MaPFlow tool is validated. More details about the implementation of the under investigation AL module within MaPFlow and the aeroelastic coupling can be found in [55].…”
Section: The Structural Dynamics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the ASM and ALM capture the wake dynamics with greater fidelity than the actuator disk model [21,29], due to grid resolution constraints for the simulation of large wind farms, continuous improvements to the actuator disk model have been made [19,20,22]. However, using BEM to calculate loads over the blade for the ALM is of particular interest in studying the aeroelastic response of the blades [40][41][42][43][44][45][46][47]. Moreover, Draper et al [48,49] conducted a grid sensitivity analysis on the performance of the actuator line model for coarse resolutions, i.e., larger than the recommended (D/∆ grid < 50).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%