2016
DOI: 10.1130/b31336.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a fracture network in crystalline rocks during weathering: Study of Bishop Creek chronosequence using X-ray computed tomography and14C-PMMA impregnation method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, most differentiate micro porosity as water filled pore space at field capacity, with diameters less the 30 μm (typically inter‐grain pores in soil), and macro porosity as air‐filled pore space at field capacity, with diameters greater than 30 μm (typically inter aggregate voids in soil). Because weathered bedrock, saprock, and saprolite have no identifiable aggregates, but can have large voids based on mineral grain size and fractures, as well as microcrack and macrocrack structures (Mazurier et al, ), we have defined pore size distribution here as micro pores: less than 30 μm; meso pores: 30–75 μm; and macro pores: >75 μm. Examples of mechanisms that form these different size classes of porosity are: tectonically formed joint fractures and microfractures; microfractures formed and expanded by weathering (e.g., stress fracturing induced by biotite expansion); and pores generated by chemical dissolution and resulting material loss (Mazurier et al, ; Rossi & Graham, ).…”
Section: Process Controls On Plant‐accessible Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, most differentiate micro porosity as water filled pore space at field capacity, with diameters less the 30 μm (typically inter‐grain pores in soil), and macro porosity as air‐filled pore space at field capacity, with diameters greater than 30 μm (typically inter aggregate voids in soil). Because weathered bedrock, saprock, and saprolite have no identifiable aggregates, but can have large voids based on mineral grain size and fractures, as well as microcrack and macrocrack structures (Mazurier et al, ), we have defined pore size distribution here as micro pores: less than 30 μm; meso pores: 30–75 μm; and macro pores: >75 μm. Examples of mechanisms that form these different size classes of porosity are: tectonically formed joint fractures and microfractures; microfractures formed and expanded by weathering (e.g., stress fracturing induced by biotite expansion); and pores generated by chemical dissolution and resulting material loss (Mazurier et al, ; Rossi & Graham, ).…”
Section: Process Controls On Plant‐accessible Watermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, further mechanical disintegration by fault wear processes produces fine-grained gouge and therefore low threshold size and connectivity impeding permeability (Géraud et al, 1995(Géraud et al, , 2006Bense et al, 2013). Fracturing may be accompanied or succeeded by fracture wall dissolution or precipitation due to chemically active fluids within the fracture network (Boyce et al, 2003;Ferry, 1979;Mazurier et al, 2016;Nishimoto and Yoshida, 2010), which may either increase or decrease the porosity and threshold size (Géraud et al, 2010;Katsube and Kamineni, 1983;Yoshida et al, 2009). Also, volumetric expansion related to alteration of primary sheeted silicates such as biotite may induce local stress variations producing fractures (Lachassagne et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, volumetric expansion related to alteration of primary sheeted silicates such as biotite may induce local stress variations producing fractures (Lachassagne et al, 2011). Conceptual models of porosity and permeability distribution in complex fracture or fault zones have been drawn to account for a variety of conductive and sealing structures (Bense et al, 2013;Caine et al, 1996;Evans et al, 1997;Faulkner et al, 2010Faulkner et al, , 2011Mitchell and Faulkner, 2009;Wilson et al, 2003). Porosity-permeability relations of these structures are not straightforward since permeability depends on the pore-throat arrangement and scales linearly with the porosity and by power law with the characteristic threshold size (Bernabé et al, 2003;David et al, 1994;Katz and Thompson, 1987;Wardlaw et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, further mechanical disintegration by fault wear processes produces fine-grained gouge and therefore low threshold size and connectivity impeding permeability (Géraud et al, 1995(Géraud et al, , 2006Bense et al, 2013). Fracturing may be accompanied or succeeded by fracture wall dissolution or precipitation due to chemically active fluids within the fracture network (Boyce et al, 2003;Ferry, 1979;Mazurier et al, 2016;Nishimoto and Yoshida, 2010), which may either increase or decrease the porosity and threshold size (Géraud et al, 2010;Katsube and Kamineni, 1983;Yoshida et al, 2009). Also, volumetric expansion related to alteration of primary sheeted silicates such as biotite may induce local stress variations producing fractures (Lachassagne et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, volumetric expansion related to alteration of primary sheeted silicates such as biotite may induce local stress variations producing fractures (Lachassagne et al, 2011). Conceptual models of porosity and permeability distribution in complex fracture or fault zones have been drawn to account for a variety of conductive and sealing structures (Bense et al, 2013;Caine et al, 1996;Evans et al, 1997;Faulkner et al, 2010Faulkner et al, , 2011Mitchell and Faulkner, 2009;Wilson et al, 2003). Porosity-permeability relations of these structures are not straightforward since permeability depends on the pore-throat arrangement and scales linearly with the porosity and by power law with the characteristic threshold size (Bernabé et al, 2003;David et al, 1994;Katz and Thompson, 1987;Wardlaw et al, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%