1955
DOI: 10.1002/j.1551-8833.1955.tb19236.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Fresh‐Water Barrier in Southern California for the Prevention of Sea Water Intrusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

1956
1956
1985
1985

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“….,; As a result of these cooperative studies, several detailed re-ports have been prepared and submitted to the State Water Resources Board (2,6,7,8). In addition to the above mentioned formal publications, numerous reports on the problem of sea water intrusion in California have appeared in various technical journals (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“….,; As a result of these cooperative studies, several detailed re-ports have been prepared and submitted to the State Water Resources Board (2,6,7,8). In addition to the above mentioned formal publications, numerous reports on the problem of sea water intrusion in California have appeared in various technical journals (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14).…”
Section: Previous Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phase was completed 1 year later. Construction of the pipeline was started in the fall of mental Project is presented in the final report of the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (6), and in a technical paper by Laverty and van der Goot (12). Only a brief description of the injection operations and summary of findings will be presented here.…”
Section: West Coast Basin Projectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In answer to the question "If artificial recharge is being practiced in your state, is it being done primarily to: [1] prevent salt water intrusion; [2] conserve water generally; or [3] solve specific water problems?" The following answers were received: In Arkansas and New Jersey, it was reported, recharge is practiced both for general conservation and for solving specific problems.…”
Section: Present Recharge Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ç äéáìüñöùóç ôùí ðáñáðÜíù åîéóþóåùí âïÞèçóå óçìáíôéêÜ óôçí êáôáíüçóç ôçò öõóéêÞò ôïõ ðñïâëÞìáôïò ôçò áëëçëåðéäñÜóåéò ôùí äýï õãñþí, áëëÜ êõñßùò ôåñìÜôéóå ôçí åóöáëìÝíç åöáñìïãÞ ôçò áñ÷Þò Ghyben -Herzberg ÷ñçóéìïðïéþíôáò ìüíï ìåôñÞóåéò ôïõ õäñáõëéêïý öïñôßïõ. Ôéò åðüìåíåò äåêáåôßåò äçìïóéåýôçêå Ýíáò óçìáíôéêüò áñéèìüò åñãáóéþí óå ó÷Ýóç ìå ôçí êáôáíüçóç ôùí ìç÷áíéóìþí ôçò õäñïäõíáìéêÞò äéáóðïñÜò êáé ðõêíüôçôáò, êáèþò êáé óõãêñßóåéò ìåôáîý áíáëõôéêþí êáé áñéèìçôéêþí ëýóåùí [Bienmond 1957, Todd and Huisman 1959, Volker 1961, Stern et al 1956, Jacobs and Schmorak 1960, Perlmutter and Crandell 1959, Isbister 1962, Cooper et al 1964, Poland 1947, Laverty and Van der Goot 1955, Wentworth 1939, Winslow et al 1957]. Åðßóçò, óå áñêåôÝò åñãáóßåò ãßíåôáé áíáöïñÜ ôçò óçìáóßáò ôçò ãåùëïãßáò ôùí õäñï-öïñÝùí êáé ôùí ìåôáâïëþí ôçò äéáðåñáôüôçôáò.…”
Section: ìáèçìáôéêü ìïíôýëá ðñïóïìïßùóçò ðáñüêôéùí õäñïöïñýùíunclassified