2017
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-52076-6_9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Holistic Method to Analyse the Consumption of Energy and Technical Services in Manufacturing Facilities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In three more recent studies, energy saving opportunities were discovered through employment of another composite metric called "value-added energy" [228,264,265]. On the other hand, Taghavi et al, (2014) criticized existing social pillar KPIs for being reactive rather than proactive in generating true value for decision making [266].…”
Section: Key Performance Indicators (Kpis) Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In three more recent studies, energy saving opportunities were discovered through employment of another composite metric called "value-added energy" [228,264,265]. On the other hand, Taghavi et al, (2014) criticized existing social pillar KPIs for being reactive rather than proactive in generating true value for decision making [266].…”
Section: Key Performance Indicators (Kpis) Constructmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another popular VSM-based framework type that attracted attention of researchers was energy value stream mapping. Müller et al, (2014) [313] and Verma and Sharma (2016) [265] tried to identify value-added and non-value added time and energy consumption in production and logistics settings as a part of waste elimination activities while Cosgrove et al, (2017) [264] focused on the identification of direct, indirect, and auxiliary energy consumption by significant energy users (SEUs) in production facilities. Cost factors associated with consumption rates were also addressed within the scope of lean principles.…”
Section: Past Lean-based Sustainability Assessment Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%