2018
DOI: 10.1504/ejie.2018.089878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a knowledge-based intelligent decision support system for operational risk management of global supply chains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the cascading effect of risks on global SNs, Ojha et al (2018) used the Bayesian network theory to analyse SNs faced with simultaneous disruptions, providing a holistic measurement approach for predicting the complex behaviour of risk propagation for improved SN risk management. Park, Yoon, and Yoo (2018) proposed a knowledge-based intelligent decision support system for SC risk management, providing SC managers with a practical tool to accurately predict and effectively control operational risk. Selecting better enterprise locations and minimising transportation costs are required to construct a resilient SN (Altiparmak et al 2006).…”
Section: Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considering the cascading effect of risks on global SNs, Ojha et al (2018) used the Bayesian network theory to analyse SNs faced with simultaneous disruptions, providing a holistic measurement approach for predicting the complex behaviour of risk propagation for improved SN risk management. Park, Yoon, and Yoo (2018) proposed a knowledge-based intelligent decision support system for SC risk management, providing SC managers with a practical tool to accurately predict and effectively control operational risk. Selecting better enterprise locations and minimising transportation costs are required to construct a resilient SN (Altiparmak et al 2006).…”
Section: Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of SNs that are resilient against disruptions has been extensively studied from several perspectives such as the risk management perspective (e.g. Chopra and Sodhi 2004;Nickel, Saldanha-da-Gama, and Ziegler 2012;Ledwoch, Yasarcan, and Brintrup 2018;Ojha et al 2018;Park, Yoon, and Yoo 2018;Nooraie et al 2019), the optimisation problem perspective (e.g. Altiparmak et al 2006;Wang and Ip 2009;Cardoso et al 2015;Dixit, Seshadrinath, and Tiwari 2016;Kamalahmadi and Mellat-Parast 2016b), the sourcing strategy perspective (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several applications of PCA have been proposed in the context of SCM, showing relevant benefits on the supplier selection problem in multi-item/multi-supplier environments [38] or on the extraction of the most relevant sustainability indicators to conduct ecoe ciency performance analyses in industrial companies [39]. PCA can also contribute to the identification of operational risk sources (see, e.g., [40]) and, for our case in particular, to better comprehend the risk profiles of the di↵erent inventory items according to the logistic features associated with them. With this knowledge base, we expect that company experts can develop more e↵ective action plans to improve and support the inventory control decision-making process.…”
Section: Modeling Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in recent years there has been a plethora of studies on technology readiness and technology acceptance from the consumer's perspective, industrial context, or in the organizational adoption as a whole [5,10,14,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], there is scarcity of research from an employee's perspective as the unit of analysis for readiness and technology acceptance [11,36,[38][39][40][41][42] in e-business environments. Moreover, no studies of such nature are found for technology intensive environments.…”
Section: Employees Customersmentioning
confidence: 99%