2009
DOI: 10.1007/s11032-009-9313-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a locus-specific, co-dominant SCAR marker for assisted-selection of the Sw-5 (Tospovirus resistance) gene cluster in a wide range of tomato accessions

Abstract: The best levels of broad-spectrum Tospovirus resistance reported in tomatoes thus far are conferred by the Sw-5 locus. This locus contains at least five paralogues (denoted Sw-5a through Sw-5e), of which Sw-5b represents the actual resistance gene. Here we evaluated a panel of seven PCR primer pairs matching different sequences within a genomic region spanning the Sw-5a and Sw-5b gene cluster. Primer efficiency evaluation was done employing tomato isolines with and without the Sw-5 locus. One primer pair produ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
2
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…After seven generations of backcross breeding (using ‘Santa Clara’ as a recurrent parent), a Tospovirus ‐resistant near‐isogenic line was selected from a segregating F 8 population. This inbred line (named ‘CNPH LAM 147’) was phenotypically very similar to ‘Santa Clara’, differing, however, in its resistance response to Tospovirus , because of the presence of the genomic segment encompassing the locus with the Sw ‐5 gene cluster (Dianese et al ., ). Progeny tests were carried out with ‘Santa Clara’ and ‘CNPH LAM 147’ in order to confirm the homozygous condition of both inbred lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…After seven generations of backcross breeding (using ‘Santa Clara’ as a recurrent parent), a Tospovirus ‐resistant near‐isogenic line was selected from a segregating F 8 population. This inbred line (named ‘CNPH LAM 147’) was phenotypically very similar to ‘Santa Clara’, differing, however, in its resistance response to Tospovirus , because of the presence of the genomic segment encompassing the locus with the Sw ‐5 gene cluster (Dianese et al ., ). Progeny tests were carried out with ‘Santa Clara’ and ‘CNPH LAM 147’ in order to confirm the homozygous condition of both inbred lines.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Mechanical inoculation with TSWV (BR‐01 isolate) was performed in 20 plants of ‘Santa Clara’ and 20 plants of the ‘CNPH LAM 147’ line, following standard procedures (Boiteux and Giordano, ). A co‐dominant molecular marker system (Dianese et al ., ), able to discriminate between heterozygous resistant ( Sw ‐5/ sw ‐5) and homozygous resistant ( Sw ‐5/ Sw ‐5) plants, was employed in conjunction with the inoculation assays, aiming to obtain two pure and contrasting near‐isogenic lines. Total genomic DNA was extracted from asymptomatic ‘CNPH LAM 147’ and also from the mock‐inoculated ‘Santa Clara’ plants.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This gene cluster originates from Solanum peruvianum and has been the most widely deployed resistance source against TSWV because of its durability and the ability to provide stable resistance against tospovirus species and isolates from different geographic locations (14, 15, 47,106,127,129,130). Although the Sw-5 gene cluster was cloned and characterized in 2001, only recently have molecular markers that assist in breeding been reported (32,112).…”
Section: Natural Genetic Sources Against Tospoviruses For Tomato Breementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular markers specifically targeting the Sw-5 genomic region (Dianese et al 2010) could be used for this analysis. In addition, the molecular cloning of the genetic factors associated with this broad-spectrum resistance might provide a new set of transgenic strategies to control resistance to other Tospovirus species described so far affecting tomato as well as other vegetable, ornamental, and field crops (Hassani-Mehraban et al 2005;Whitfield et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%