2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a method for the characterization and operation of UV-LED for water treatment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Kim et al [11] obtained higher inactivation of MS2 with LEDs compared to LPUV lamps at both wavelengths of 266 and 279 nm, respectively. In addition to the slightly different wavelengths investigated in these studies, the great diversity in UV-LED reactor configurations, radiation profiles and microbiological methods makes direct comparisons difficult [27]. Beck et al [8] noted that the discrepancies between their study and that of Bowker et al [3] were most likely due to the fact that the latter considered UV-LEDs to be a monochromatic light source.…”
Section: Uv Fluence Determination and Ms2 Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kim et al [11] obtained higher inactivation of MS2 with LEDs compared to LPUV lamps at both wavelengths of 266 and 279 nm, respectively. In addition to the slightly different wavelengths investigated in these studies, the great diversity in UV-LED reactor configurations, radiation profiles and microbiological methods makes direct comparisons difficult [27]. Beck et al [8] noted that the discrepancies between their study and that of Bowker et al [3] were most likely due to the fact that the latter considered UV-LEDs to be a monochromatic light source.…”
Section: Uv Fluence Determination and Ms2 Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beck et al [8] noted that the discrepancies between their study and that of Bowker et al [3] were most likely due to the fact that the latter considered UV-LEDs to be a monochromatic light source. Instead, there seems to be a consensus in recent studies that UV-LEDs are polychromatic light sources with Gaussian-distributed emission spectra with relatively narrow bandwidths [27,28]. It is thought that polychromatic light could have multiple pathways of inactivation by: (i) supplying photons which target the absorption maxima of different microorganisms; (ii) provide alternative mechanisms of inactivation (e.g., free radical or reactive oxygen species production); (iii) crosslinking more of the DNA/RNA at key active sites within the genetic code and (iv) damaging other functional structures within microorganisms (e.g., capsid) [29].…”
Section: Uv Fluence Determination and Ms2 Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The optical performance of the UV-LED devices has been studied by Kheyrandish et al showing that higher solder point temperatures (T S ) resulted in lower optical output power, shift of the peak wavelength, and an increase of the full width at half maximum (FWHM) [5]. The achieved internal quantum efficiency (IQE) of UV-C LEDs can be quite high, that is, somewhere between 15 and 70%, supported by photoluminescence studies and ray-tracing calculations.…”
Section: Efficiency Droop and Optical Performance Of Uv-ledsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is known that the UV-C LEDs have lower external quantum efficiency (EQE) with a value less than 10%, compared with conventional LED light sources, for example, blue LED (400-450 nm) has an EQE > 70%. In microbiological research, the shift of the peak wavelengths would result in an inaccurate interpretation in microbial studies [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%