2021
DOI: 10.3390/f12040406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Modality-Invariant Multi-Layer Perceptron to Predict Operational Events in Motor-Manual Willow Felling Operations

Abstract: Motor-manual operations are commonly implemented in the traditional and short rotation forestry. Deep knowledge of their performance is needed for various strategic, tactical and operational decisions that rely on large amounts of data. To overcome the limitations of traditional analytical methods, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been lately used to deal with various types of signals and problems to be solved. However, the reliability of AI models depends largely on the quality of the signals and on the sensi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
20
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
20
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The same classification performance metrics and errors were computed in the testing phase, where the Log loss was used as a metric to evaluate the generalization errors. Following the testing phase, the probabilities of given data points to fall within a given class (“Drilling”, “Other”, “Stopped”) were extracted and plotted against the magnitude data of those datasets, following the procedure described in [ 13 ]. The criteria used for evaluating the training and testing models and for selecting the best alternative were the classification accuracy (CA) and the Log loss error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The same classification performance metrics and errors were computed in the testing phase, where the Log loss was used as a metric to evaluate the generalization errors. Following the testing phase, the probabilities of given data points to fall within a given class (“Drilling”, “Other”, “Stopped”) were extracted and plotted against the magnitude data of those datasets, following the procedure described in [ 13 ]. The criteria used for evaluating the training and testing models and for selecting the best alternative were the classification accuracy (CA) and the Log loss error.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At this level, manual-dominated tasks have been approached in forestry under the umbrella of the so-called human activity recognition, which has been implemented by the use of various data collection platforms and machine learning techniques e.g., [ 11 , 12 ]. A similar approach has been used to monitor tool or machine-supported tasks, at least when such machines were not equipped with built-in production monitoring systems [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 13 ]; this approach still justifies its relevance due to the low to intermediary mechanization level of forest operations that still prevails in many parts of the world [ 14 , 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations