2018 New Generation of CAS (NGCAS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/ngcas.2018.8572217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a New Low-Cost EMG Monitoring System for the Classification of Finger Movement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, the average recall ranges from 84.8% to 100% for DA, 81.8% to 100% for SVM, and 63.6% to 84.8% for kNN, depending on the specific gesture. Therefore, the classification of the five different fingers reaches accuracies above 90%, comparable with the most current literature [15][16][17][18] . In particular, in one of these works the authors acquired sEMG by means of an 8-channels MYO band, and classified five finger movements and rest periods using several classifiers, including kNN and SVM, reaching a maximal accuracy of 95.8% 18 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly, the average recall ranges from 84.8% to 100% for DA, 81.8% to 100% for SVM, and 63.6% to 84.8% for kNN, depending on the specific gesture. Therefore, the classification of the five different fingers reaches accuracies above 90%, comparable with the most current literature [15][16][17][18] . In particular, in one of these works the authors acquired sEMG by means of an 8-channels MYO band, and classified five finger movements and rest periods using several classifiers, including kNN and SVM, reaching a maximal accuracy of 95.8% 18 .…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The control signal part of the prosthetic hand consists of smoothening, threshold adjustment, logic and control output sections (Asghari et al, 2007;Çelik et al, 2016;Park et al, 2003;Seguna et al, 2018;Sharmila et al, 2016;Kobayashi et al, 2010). The last part, the prosthetic hand mechanism, can be a physical/mechanical hand (Asghari et al, 2007;Çelik et al, 2016;Cinal et al, 2016;Hussain et al, 2018;Park et al, 2003;Seguna et al, 2018) or a virtual hand (Akgün et al, 2013;Çelik et al, 2016;Sharmila et al, 2016;Kobayashi et al, 2010). The control of the virtual and prosthetic hand is performed using a microcontroller or computer and data acquisition card, according to the design approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%