2007
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200600486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a new method for analysis of Sudan dyes by pressurized CEC with amperometric detection

Abstract: A new analytical method, pressurized CEC (pCEC) with amperometric detection (AD) using 1.5 mm RP nonporous silica packed columns has been developed for the rapid separation and determination of four Sudan dyes in hot chilli. The influence of several experimental parameters on the retention behavior has been investigated. The electrochemical oxidation of Sudans I-IV separated by pCEC can be reliably monitored with a carbon electrode at 10.95 V (vs. Ag/AgCl). Fast and efficient separation of the analytes was ach… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 6 shows the preconcentration, separation, and detection of eight food dyes at 5 nM levels. The sensitivities of the method for R2, G3, Y4, Y5, B2, R40, and R3 samples were ,2.14, 0.54, 1.93, 1.73, 2.13, 1.85, and 0.83 nA/nM over the range of 2.5 nM-1.0 mM with the LODs between 1.25 and 5.0 nM with the micro- These results are much lower than those obtained in traditional CE [18][19][20], pressurized CEC with amperometric detection [21], liquid-liquid extraction [23], microemulsion EKC [24], GC [25], and large-volume sample stacking in CE methods [26] and comparable to those obtained in the HPLC method [22].…”
Section: Analytical Performances Of the Methodscontrasting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 6 shows the preconcentration, separation, and detection of eight food dyes at 5 nM levels. The sensitivities of the method for R2, G3, Y4, Y5, B2, R40, and R3 samples were ,2.14, 0.54, 1.93, 1.73, 2.13, 1.85, and 0.83 nA/nM over the range of 2.5 nM-1.0 mM with the LODs between 1.25 and 5.0 nM with the micro- These results are much lower than those obtained in traditional CE [18][19][20], pressurized CEC with amperometric detection [21], liquid-liquid extraction [23], microemulsion EKC [24], GC [25], and large-volume sample stacking in CE methods [26] and comparable to those obtained in the HPLC method [22].…”
Section: Analytical Performances Of the Methodscontrasting
confidence: 79%
“…Since highly sensitive and selective detection of food dyes is of central importance to food safety as well as to forensic, biological, pharmaceuticals, and evolutionary studies, many efforts have been previously made with traditional CE [17][18][19][20], pressurized CEC [21], HPLC [22], liquid-liquid extraction [23], microemulsion EKC [24], GC [25], and large-volume sample stacking in a CE system [26]. The sensitivity of traditional methods is also sometimes not enough for trace analysis of food dyes in small quantities of real samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The LODs were in the range of 100-600 mg/L. Liu et al [18] employed pressurised CEC and amperometric detection to separate and detect the same four analytes. However, they achieved the separation in half the time (7 min compared to 15 min).…”
Section: Dyesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Um exemplo é o método desenvolvido recentemente por Liu et al, 77 que envolve a determinação de corantes Sudão em tempero culinário, empregando pCEC com detecção amperométrica.…”
Section: Detecção E Acoplamento Cec-msunclassified