2017
DOI: 10.1101/113837
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Novel CD4+TCR Transgenic Line that Reveals a Dominant Role for CD8+DC and CD40-Signaling in the Generation of Helper and CTL Responses to Blood Stage Malaria

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A second substantial finding is that during severe malaria, cDC1 are critical for priming and promoting parasite‐specific Th1 CD4 T cells. This is consistent with the results of a study using a CD4 TCR‐transgenic mouse specific for a Plasmodium epitope (Fernandez‐Ruiz et al , ). More generally, these data are in line with the established propensity of cDC1 to secrete IL‐12 during infection by intracellular pathogens (Mashayekhi et al , ; Alexandre et al , ) and the implication of cDC1 in Th1 polarization during other parasitic infections such as leishmaniasis (Ashok et al , ; Martinez‐Lopez et al , ) and toxoplasmosis (Mashayekhi et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A second substantial finding is that during severe malaria, cDC1 are critical for priming and promoting parasite‐specific Th1 CD4 T cells. This is consistent with the results of a study using a CD4 TCR‐transgenic mouse specific for a Plasmodium epitope (Fernandez‐Ruiz et al , ). More generally, these data are in line with the established propensity of cDC1 to secrete IL‐12 during infection by intracellular pathogens (Mashayekhi et al , ; Alexandre et al , ) and the implication of cDC1 in Th1 polarization during other parasitic infections such as leishmaniasis (Ashok et al , ; Martinez‐Lopez et al , ) and toxoplasmosis (Mashayekhi et al , ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…However, our finding that cDC1 from naïve mice also present pRBC‐derived antigens better than cDC2 suggests that this difference is not, or at least not solely, dictated by infection. Using a CD4 T‐cell hybridoma that recognizes a currently undefined Plasmodium epitope, a Biorxiv‐posted study (Fernandez‐Ruiz et al , ) reports that cDC1 are more stimulatory than CD4 + DC and double‐negative DC, both in naïve mice and at 3 days post‐infection. Although the sensitivity of our hybridomas did not allow us to evaluate the ETRAMP10.2 MHC II presentation at such an early time point (data not shown), our data are consistent with this work.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, our findings are remarkably similar to the phenotype of IL-12p40 KO mice described by Stevenson and Su nearly a decade ago [289]. A very recent study utilizing the newly created Pb-TII CD4 transgenic T-cell line and XCR-1-DTR transgenic mouse model recapitulated similar findings and roles of CD8 + DCs in CD4 + and CD8 + T-cell priming in the PbA ECM model [438].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…To extend the above studies to an in vivo setting, we used an experimental model of severe malaria caused by infection of C57BL/6 mice with P. berghei ANKA ( Pb A). We employed PbTII mice (Enders et al, 2021; Fernandez-Ruiz et al, 2017), a TCR transgenic mouse line that produce CD4 + T cells specific for I-A b -restricted PbA heat shock protein 90 expressed by all rodent and human Plasmodium species, and crossed these with Tmem173 -deficient mice (James et al, 2018; Jin et al, 2011) to generate STING-deficient PbTII cells (PbTII ΔSting ). Wild-type control PbTII cells were generated by crossing PbTII TCR transgenic mice with congenic (CD45.1) C57BL/6 mice to produce mice expressing both cd45.1 and cd45.2 alleles (PbTII WT ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%