2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09817-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a participation style scale for online instructional discussions

Abstract: The purpose of this study is to develop a standardized measurement tool that can be used to determine the participation styles of individuals participating in online instructional discussions. The scale consists of two dimensions called 'Why' and 'How.' The Why dimension comprises the main motivators of the participants' participation in online instructional environments, whereas the How dimension comprises items expressing participation behaviors or forms. Two separate datasets were used for exploratory facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
1
6

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
15
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…EFA was carried out to determine the factors of the instrument measuring the achievement of student competencies. The results of the analysis based on KMO (>0.5) values, Bartlett test values (p <0.05), MSA (>0.5), communalities values (>0.5), eigenvalues (>1.0), factor loading (>0.4) (Harlan & Van Haneghan, 2020;Kang, Hense, Scheersoi & Keinonen, 2019;Pala & Erdem, 2020). The analysis of the measurement model using CFA aims to test the suitability of the theorized model with empirical data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EFA was carried out to determine the factors of the instrument measuring the achievement of student competencies. The results of the analysis based on KMO (>0.5) values, Bartlett test values (p <0.05), MSA (>0.5), communalities values (>0.5), eigenvalues (>1.0), factor loading (>0.4) (Harlan & Van Haneghan, 2020;Kang, Hense, Scheersoi & Keinonen, 2019;Pala & Erdem, 2020). The analysis of the measurement model using CFA aims to test the suitability of the theorized model with empirical data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The loading factor value shows the magnitude of the correlation of each variable in the formed factor. Factor loading values ranged from 0.40 to 1.00 (Gunuc, 2015;Pala & Erdem, 2020;Reynolds & Candee). The results of the EFA test are shown in Table 4.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Factor analysis uses the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) method to find factors that are able to explain the correlation between the observed variables. The EFA value indicator meets the requirements if the KaiserMeyer-Olkin (KMO) value ranges from 0.5-1.0, the Bartlett test value (p <0.00) (Boonk et al, 2020), the Measure of Sampling Adequacy (MSA) ranges from 0.5-1.0, the communality values range from 0.5-1.0, eigenvalues above 1.0 (Reynolds & Candee, 2019), factor loading ranges from 0.40-1.00 (Chan & Luk, 2020;Gunuc, 2015;Pala & Erdem, 2020). The reliability test is accepted if the Cronbach's Alpha value is ≥0.70, Construct Reliability (CR) is more than 0.70, and Average Variance Extracted (AVE) is more than 0.50 (Daryono et al, 2020;Hair et al, 2010;Sudibjo & Nasution, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%