1996
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199604)80:2<121::aid-sce1>3.0.co;2-i
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a pool of scientific literacy test-items based on selected AAAS literacy goals

Abstract: We describe the development of a pool of paper‐and‐pencil test‐items of scientific literacy that are based on selected chapters of the 1989 American Association for the Advancement of Science overview report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology, entitled Science for All Americans. Separate pools of test‐items were developed for each of Miller's “three constitutive dimensions” of scientific literacy. Through carefully structured panel reviews using Fellows of the Royal Society of South Afri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
23

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
22
0
23
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the members of our research group all majored in chemistry and physics, so we focused on evaluating the concepts of chemistry and physics in the theme of scientific cognition. Comparing our results with test items developed by other researchers (Aikenhead & Ryan, 1992;Laugksch & Spargo, 1996), we propose that scientific cognition could be investigated via different formats of authentic assessments within a limited timeframe. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to display three different formats of authentic assessments to investigate ninth graders' scientific cognition (Figure 1).…”
Section: Development Of Authentic Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the members of our research group all majored in chemistry and physics, so we focused on evaluating the concepts of chemistry and physics in the theme of scientific cognition. Comparing our results with test items developed by other researchers (Aikenhead & Ryan, 1992;Laugksch & Spargo, 1996), we propose that scientific cognition could be investigated via different formats of authentic assessments within a limited timeframe. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to display three different formats of authentic assessments to investigate ninth graders' scientific cognition (Figure 1).…”
Section: Development Of Authentic Assessmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thomas & Durant (1987) think scientific literacy could facilitate any individual's life in a science-and technology-dominated society, such as helping to make personal decisions concerning diet, smoking, vaccination, screening programmers or safety in the home and at work. To achieve the goal of scientific literacy, teachers and science educators must concentrate on the design of instruction for student learning or on the evaluation of student performance (Aikenhead & Ryan, 1992;Champagne & Newell, 1992;Jenkins, 1992;Laugksch, 2000;Laugksch & Spargo, 1996).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In science education, large-scale studies of achievement included the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, TIMSS (Howie, 1997(Howie, , 1998(Howie, , 2001(Howie, , 2003 and measures of scientific literacy (Laugksch & Spargo, 1996, Ogunniyi, 2003b. They were strongly influenced by overseas projects: Laugksch and Spargo derived their conception of scientific literacy from the AAAS work, Ogunniyi from standard science content (as expressed in South African syllabuses before 1997, and largely incorporated into the new policies); TIMSS was designed by an international committee heavily influenced from USA and Europe.…”
Section: Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contemporary science education standards all over the world have recently been emphasizing the importance of supporting students to become scientifically literate individuals (Abd-El-Khalick, Bell, & Lederman, 1998;Hodson, 1998;Khishfe & Lederman, 2006;Laugksch & Spargo, 1996;. Developing an adequate level of understanding of the nature of science (NOS) concepts is one of the prerequisites required for scientific literacy (Abd-El-Khalick, 2005;Afonso & Gilbert, 2010;Allchin, 2014;Herman & Clough, 2014;Hogan, 2000;Lawson, 2010;Kim, Yi, & Cho, 2014;Leung, Wong, & Yung, 2015;McComas, Clough, & Almazroa, 2002;McDonald, 2010;Posnanski, 2010;Schwartz, Lederman, & Crawford, 2004;Van Dijk, 2014;Wong & Hodson, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%