2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.sajb.2008.05.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a rapid, highly efficient system of organogenesis in cowpea Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, several authors have reported direct plant regeneration from both hypocotyls (Annapurna and Rathore 2010;Nagori and Purohit 2004;Shang et al 2006;Singh et al 2002) and cotyledons (Du and Pijut 2008;Raveendar et al 2009). The data presented in this study clearly demonstrate that high-frequency adventitious shoot regeneration is possible from both hypocotyl and cotyledon segments of L. frutescens, also a woody species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, several authors have reported direct plant regeneration from both hypocotyls (Annapurna and Rathore 2010;Nagori and Purohit 2004;Shang et al 2006;Singh et al 2002) and cotyledons (Du and Pijut 2008;Raveendar et al 2009). The data presented in this study clearly demonstrate that high-frequency adventitious shoot regeneration is possible from both hypocotyl and cotyledon segments of L. frutescens, also a woody species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following 4-weeks of culture on plant growth regulator-supplemented media, the adventitious shoots in this study continued to proliferate, showing no signs of senescence or necrosis. Furthermore, the shoots did not require additional transfer to shoot multiplication or elongation medium, which is a standard procedure (Chitra and Padmaja 2005;Kumar et al 2005;Quintero-Jiménez et al 2010;Raveendar et al 2009;Zhang et al 2008), and were subsequently transferred directly onto rooting medium, thereby eliminating the need for an additional multiplication or elongation phase. In terms of shoot production time, this technique is a more efficient and rapid method of deriving shoots than the indirect organogenesis protocol or the axillary bud culture previously reported (Dewir et al 2010;Shaik et al 2010b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…De novo shoot organogenesis using EA as explants A rapid, efficient and reproducible regeneration system is a prerequisite for establishment of an efficient cowpea genetic transformation system. Although several studies of in vitro regeneration of cowpea based on organogenesis have been reported (Aasim et al, 2010;Abdu Sani et al, 2015;Mamadou et al, 2008;Manman et al, 2013;Odutayo et al, 2005;Raveendar et al, 2009;Sani et al, 2018;Tie et al, 2013;Yusuf et al, 2008), an efficient cowpea regeneration system that enables highly efficient transformation is still lacking (Manman et al, 2013). Soybean transformation based on the preexisting meristems of EA explants has been well established and provides a reliable and highly efficient mean for introducing transgenes (Aragão et al, 2000;Liu et al, 2004;Turlapati et al, 2008).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Establishment of an efficient and reproducible transformation system is based on efficient plant tissue culture using various explants (Muthukumar et al, 1995;Prem Anand et al, 2001;Choi et al, 2003;Ramakrishnan et al, 2005;Chaudhury et al, 2007;Aasim et al, 2012) and growth regulators used for shoot regeneration (Muthukumar et al, 1995;Monti et al, 1997;Pellegrineschi, 1997;Brar et al, 1999;Machuka et al, 2000;Obembe et al, 2000;Raveendar et al, 2009). No callusing was recorded on regenerating explants, in contradiction to the findings of Choi et al (2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%