2015
DOI: 10.1038/mtm.2015.17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a replication-competent lentivirus assay for dendritic cell-targeting lentiviral vectors

Abstract: It is a current regulatory requirement to demonstrate absence of detectable replication-competent lentivirus (RCL) in lentiviral vector products prior to use in clinical trials. Immune Design previously described an HIV-1-based integration-deficient lentiviral vector for use in cancer immunotherapy (VP02). VP02 is enveloped with E1001, a modified Sindbis virus glycoprotein which targets dendritic cell-specific intercellular adhesion molecule-3-grabbing non-integrin (DC-SIGN) expressed on dendritic cells in viv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…RCL of third-generation lentiviral vectors has never been observed,18, 20, 21 but the most likely scenario for formation of RCL would be through recombination of the transfer plasmid with the supporting packaging plasmids 22 8, 10, 13, 23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RCL of third-generation lentiviral vectors has never been observed,18, 20, 21 but the most likely scenario for formation of RCL would be through recombination of the transfer plasmid with the supporting packaging plasmids 22 8, 10, 13, 23.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work has demonstrated that this cell line is transduced by VP02 in a DC-SIGN-dependent manner. 3 , 11 To maximize sensitivity of the spin column method, a wide range of cell inputs within the limits suggested by the manufacturer was evaluated (1.56 × 10 4 – 1.00 × 10 6 cells/column), each of which was eluted in a final fixed volume of 400 µl, as suggested by the manufacturer to maximize DNA yield. In comparison, in the in situ extraction method, the starting cell number is fixed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…33,34 To date, the most common assays for screening gene therapy products are assays that combine an amplification phase, using a cell line capable of expanding attenuated viruses to high titer, with subsequent detection of virus using ELISA or molecular assays. 29,[35][36][37][38][39] Since RCLs arising during vector production are still theoretical, their growth rate is unknown, but it is likely to be significantly attenuated, compared to wild-type lentiviruses, due to the absence of accessory genes. 33 Therefore, regulators have required biologic assays to utilize an extended culture period of approximately 3 weeks (a minimum of 5 passages) 27 to amplify any slow-growing viruses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%