Laboratory tests with generated aerosols were conducted to test the efficacy of two recent design modifications to the well-established tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) continuous particulate matter (PM) mass monitor. The two systems tested were the sample equilibration system-equipped TEOM monitor operating at 30°C, which uses a Nafion dryer as part of the sample inlet, and the differential TEOM monitor, which adds a switched electrostatic precipitator and uses a self-referencing algorithm to determine "true PM mass." Test aerosols included ammonium sulfate, ammonium nitrate, sodium chloride, copper (II) sulfate, and mixed aerosols. Aerosols were generated with an atomizer or a vibrating orifice generator and were equilibrated in a 450-L slow flow chamber before being sampled. Relative humidity in the chamber was varied between 10 and 90%, and step changes in humidity were executed while generating aerosol to test the response of the instruments. The sample equilibration system-equipped TEOM monitor does reduce, but not totally eliminate, the sensitivity of the TEOM mass monitor to changes in humidity. The differential TEOM monitor gives every indication of being a very robust technique for the continuous real-time measurement of ambient aerosol mass, even in the presence of semi-volatile particles and condensable gases.
INTRODUCTIONThe tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) mass monitor uses a hollow oscillating microbalance to detect and report changes in mass caused by the passage of ambient air through a replaceable filter. 1 The monitor provides a continuous measure of collected mass. The purpose of this work is to understand how to better measure the atmospheric particulate matter (PM) to which people are exposed in the ambient environment. Continuous measurements of PM are desirable for a number of reasons, including (1) the capture of short, but intense, pollution events; (2) hourly mass concentration data are required for use in PM with an aerodynamic diameter less than or equal to 2.5 m (PM 2.5 ) mapping projects; and (3) more highly time resolved data are required for model evaluation. While data with higher time resolution answer some of the objections to the 24-hr integrated filters collected in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Federal Reference Method (FRM) network, the TEOM monitor still uses a filter for particle collection and is subject to the same artifact and interference problems of other filter-based PM collection methods. These limitations as they relate to the FRM for PM 2.5 2 are discussed and evaluated by Eatough et al. 3 The research described here consists of a thorough laboratory evaluation of modifications to the TEOM monitor. The modifications were made to address the limitations of the basic method and primarily involve treatment of the sample before it reaches the oscillating microbalance. The sample equilibration system (SES)-equipped TEOM monitor 4 was developed to mitigate interferences from water vapor, so extensive laboratory te...