2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.04.132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a semi-empirical equilibrium model for downdraft gasification systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(15)] (Li et al, 2004), and one that estimates the amount of the total C converted to the gas phase (β), as given by [eq. (16)] (Aydin et al, 2017 ER (equivalence ratio) is the ratio of the air supplied to the system and the stoichiometric air requirement for complete combustion.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(15)] (Li et al, 2004), and one that estimates the amount of the total C converted to the gas phase (β), as given by [eq. (16)] (Aydin et al, 2017 ER (equivalence ratio) is the ratio of the air supplied to the system and the stoichiometric air requirement for complete combustion.…”
Section: Model Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the equilibrium is not reached in real cases, these models can predict the composition of syngas produced through gasification processes with satisfactory accuracy (Gambarotta et al, 2017). The models can be based on Gibbs Energy minimization (Fournel et al, 2015;Mendiburu et al, 2014;Jarungthammachote & Dutta, 2008) or use of equilibrium constants (Aydin et al, 2017;Mozafari et al, 2017;Jarungthammachote & Dutta, 2007). Altafini, Wander, and Barreto performed gasification tests using Pinus Elliotis sawdust as fuel (Altafini et al, 2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different model studies have been employed to examine the effects of the variables affecting the gasification performance to evaluate product gas yield and composition . Depending on the complexity of the gasification, these models may be 3D fluid dynamical, artificial neural networks, artificial intelligence, kinetic‐based, or less complex equilibrium models . Even though none of the mathematical model is perfect for expressing or representing the gasification system, there is still a need for developing mathematical models .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Depending on the complexity of the gasification, these models may be 3D fluid dynamical, artificial neural networks, artificial intelligence, kinetic-based, or less complex equilibrium models. [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] Even though none of the mathematical model is perfect for expressing or representing the gasification system, there is still a need for developing mathematical models. 20 For computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models, a set of energy, momentum, and mass equations are solved to find the distribution of various parameters such as concentration and temperature over a certain region of a gasifier.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations 5 and 6 were employed in this work as auxiliary equations to solve the nonlinear equations system. These two reactions have been taken into account by Gagliano et al (2016) and Aydin et al (2017) to solve downdraft gasification models based on equilibrium assumptions. Additional gasification products, H2S and COS, are added to the model that are associated with the sulfur contained in the biomass.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%