2020
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2020.568771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Sinitic Clubroot Differential Set for the Pathotype Classification of Plasmodiophora brassicae

Abstract: Plasmodiophora brassicae , which is known for its broad genetic diversity for virulence, is the causal agent of clubroot disease of Brassica crops worldwide. Studies on pathotype characterization with four differential hosts according to Williams’ classification system showed the predominance of pathotype 4 in China. However, the genetic variability within pathotype 4 complicates the breeding of durable clubroot-resistant (CR) cultivars. Herein, a Sinitic clubroot differential… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
57
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
57
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These assays aim to capture the occurrence and extent of physiologic specialization in populations of the pathogen [ 16 ]. Numerous differential sets have been proposed to study pathogenic variability in P. brassicae [ 20 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The differentials of Williams, one of the earliest and among the most commonly used systems, consists of four differential hosts that can distinguish a theoretical maximum of 16 pathotypes [ 29 ].…”
Section: Current Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These assays aim to capture the occurrence and extent of physiologic specialization in populations of the pathogen [ 16 ]. Numerous differential sets have been proposed to study pathogenic variability in P. brassicae [ 20 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 ]. The differentials of Williams, one of the earliest and among the most commonly used systems, consists of four differential hosts that can distinguish a theoretical maximum of 16 pathotypes [ 29 ].…”
Section: Current Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each pathotype is assigned a number followed by a letter (for example, ‘pathotype 3A’); the numbers correspond to the Williams’ [ 29 ] pathotype designation, while the letters are unique to the CCD set and denote variants of the Williams’ pathotypes [ 20 , 23 ]. Most recently, the Sinitic Clubroot Differential (SCD) set was developed in China using differential hosts with known clubroot-resistance genes to explore the genetic variability of pathotype 4, as defined by the differentials of Williams [ 32 ]. The SCD set was essential when isolates identified as pathotype 4 on the system of Williams were found to exhibit varied virulence patterns on various Chinese cabbage ( B. rapa ) and cabbage ( B. oleracea ) cultivars.…”
Section: Current Diagnostic Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additional adaptations were made using regional economical important hosts to fit local needs, such as the Canadian Clubroot differential set (CCD) with a focus on rapeseed resistance [41]. Other systems were focusing on Chinese cabbage resistance [42][43][44]. Those different systems make it difficult to compare pathotypes between studies, as the pathotype determined by one system cannot be translated into another system.…”
Section: Genomes and Pathotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other systems focusing on Chinese cabbage resistance Different pathotypes occurring dominant in different regions or areas in the world. The Williams pathotype 3 appears to be dominant in Alberta, Canada [45,46], and Korea [43], whereas Williams pathotype 4 is dominant in China [42]. Using the ECD system dominant pathotypes were also determined in Australia as 16/3/12 and 16/3/31 [47].…”
Section: Genomes and Pathotypesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation