2022
DOI: 10.3390/s22145129
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Soil Organic Matter Content Prediction Model Based on Supervised Learning Using Vis-NIR/SWIR Spectroscopy

Abstract: In the current scenario of anthropogenic climate change, carbon credit security is becoming increasingly important worldwide. Topsoil is the terrestrial ecosystem component with the largest carbon sequestration capacity. Since soil organic matter (SOM), which is mostly composed of organic carbon, and can be affected by rainfall, cultivation, and pollutant inflow, predicting SOM content through regular monitoring is necessary to secure a stable carbon sink. In addition, topsoil in the Republic of Korea is vulne… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual SSC in the citrus fruits was compared with those predicted from the calibration (cross-validation) or independent validation datasets using the PLSR models. The performance of each model was evaluated by estimating the coefficient of determination of the calibration set (R c 2 ), the cross-validation set (R v 2 ), and the prediction set (R p 2 ), as well as root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), cross-validation set (RMSEV), and prediction (RMSEP), in addition to the optimal factor (F) [ 18 , 27 ]. The model with the highest R v 2 and lowest RMSEV values was selected as the optimal model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The actual SSC in the citrus fruits was compared with those predicted from the calibration (cross-validation) or independent validation datasets using the PLSR models. The performance of each model was evaluated by estimating the coefficient of determination of the calibration set (R c 2 ), the cross-validation set (R v 2 ), and the prediction set (R p 2 ), as well as root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), cross-validation set (RMSEV), and prediction (RMSEP), in addition to the optimal factor (F) [ 18 , 27 ]. The model with the highest R v 2 and lowest RMSEV values was selected as the optimal model.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 ), the cross-validation set (R v 2 ), and the prediction set (R p 2 ), as well as root mean square error of calibration (RMSEC), cross-validation set (RMSEV), and prediction (RMSEP), in addition to the optimal factor (F) [18,27]. The model with the highest R v 2 and lowest RMSEV values was selected as the optimal model.…”
Section: Development Of Multivariate Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples taken from five points in each area were mixed and homogenized as representative samples. The collected topsoil samples were brought to the laboratory, air-dried, and sieved through a 2 mm mesh to remove rock fragments and coarse roots [32].…”
Section: Topsoil Sample Collection and Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It then evaluates each model against a calibration set. The optimal factors for PLSR were determined using leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV) as the validation method [24,30,32]. A plot of the LOOCV residual variance versus the number of LVs was tested to specify the optimal number of LVs (called optimal factors) for PLSR.…”
Section: Partial Least Squares Regression (Plsr)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation