The article reviews the background and current status of pretargeting for cancer imaging and therapy with radionuclides. Pretargeting procedures were introduced f20 years ago as an alternative to directly radiolabeled antibodies. Because they were multistep processes, they were met with resistance but have since progressed to simple and improved procedures that could become the next generation of imaging and therapy with radionuclides. The separation of the radiolabeled compound from the antibody-targeting agent affords pretargeting procedures considerable flexibility in the radiolabeling process, providing opportunities for molecular imaging using g-or positron-emitting radionuclides and a variety of h-and a-emitting radionuclides of therapeutic applications. Pretargeting methods improve tumor/ nontumor ratios, exceeding that achieved with directly radiolabeled FabV fragments, particularly within just a few hours of the radionuclide injection. In addition, tumor uptake exceeds that of a FabV fragment by as much as 10-fold, giving pretargeting a greatly enhanced sensitivity for imaging. Advances in molecular biology have led to the development of novel binding proteins that have further improved radionuclide delivery in these systems. Studies in a variety of hematologic and solid tumor models have shown advantages of pretargeting compared with directly radiolabeled IgG for therapy, and there are several clinical studies under way that are also showing promising results. Thus, the next generation of targeting agents will likely employ pretargeting approaches to optimize radionuclide delivery for a wide range of applications.Radiation continues to play an integral role in the management of cancer, from the use of X-rays and computed tomography for detection to the use of external beam and interstitial radiotherapy (brachytherapy and rapid interstitial therapy) for treatment. Nuclear medicine, which involves the use of internally administered radionuclides, traditionally has played a minor role in the management of cancer, initially relying primarily on the use of [ 67 Ga]citrate for lymphoma imaging and 131 INa for thyroid cancer treatment. However, with the advent of positron emission tomography and [ 18 F]deoxyglucose, and thanks to the development of new antibody-guided therapeutics for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and emerging peptide-targeted therapeutics, the role of nuclear medicine in the management of cancer is increasing (1, 2).Except for 131 INa and radionuclides used for palliation of bone pain that are selectively taken up by their respective tissues, the specificity for cancer of internally administered radionuclides depends on its coupling to a targeting compound. For example, [18 F]deoxyglucose is concentrated in cancers because they are more metabolically active than most other cells in the body and therefore will accrue more deoxyglucose than surrounding cells. Antibodies have been one of the most commonly used targeting agents, with an extensive history spanning over 50 years (3). During this...