2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.10.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a suicide prevention education program for university students: a single-arm pilot study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
10
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, no difference was found between the two groups in the results pertaining to the help-seeking intention, but the help-seeking attention was found to rise temporarily in this study. As in previous studies (Katsumata et al, 2017;Strunk et al, 2014) , the results of this study also reinforce the difficulty of longitudinal improvement of the help-seeking intention. The program attempted to intervene to mitigate the general self-stigma related to the help-seeking intention, but some of the intervention research of the anti-stigmatization program did not establish the desired long-term effects (Shimotsu, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…In contrast, no difference was found between the two groups in the results pertaining to the help-seeking intention, but the help-seeking attention was found to rise temporarily in this study. As in previous studies (Katsumata et al, 2017;Strunk et al, 2014) , the results of this study also reinforce the difficulty of longitudinal improvement of the help-seeking intention. The program attempted to intervene to mitigate the general self-stigma related to the help-seeking intention, but some of the intervention research of the anti-stigmatization program did not establish the desired long-term effects (Shimotsu, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Further, one-third of the participants had one or more chances to utilize their skills within a month of the training. Likewise, Katsumata et al’s (2017) study of a gatekeeper program for Japanese university students also had positive results. Studies in universities in the US have shown that gatekeeper interventions have improved students’ ability to identify suicidal peers and increase their willingness to intervene (Samuolis et al, 2020), as well as increase the number of referrals to mental health specialists, especially among females (Rallis et al, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The gatekeeper model has also been applied to address suicide risk within organizations such as colleges (Cross et al., 2010; Funkhouser et al., 2017; Katsumata et al., 2017; Rallis et al., 2018; Sari et al., 2008; Taub et al., 2013; Thombs et al., 2015; Tompkins & Witt, 2009; Tsong et al., 2019) or military groups (Smith‐Osborne et al., 2017). Brief gatekeeper training provided to college residence advisors (McLean & Swanbrow Becker, 2018; Sari et al., 2008) and students (Funkhouser et al., 2017; Katsumata et al., 2017; Rallis et al., 2018; Tsong et al., 2019) has been shown to be effective in increasing awareness of suicide risk factors and skills for referring suicidal students for support (Taub et al., 2013), although one study failed to find evidence of effective skill acquisition (McLean & Swanbrow Becker, 2018). The effects of these trainings appear to have some sustainability, with gatekeeper skill competency persisting across university semesters (Thombs et al., 2015).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%