1983
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.29.5.530
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a Tool for Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction

Abstract: This paper reports on a technique for measuring and analyzing computer user satisfaction. Starting with the literature and using the critical incident interview technique, 39 factors affecting satisfaction were identified. Adapting the semantic differential scaling technique, a questionnaire for measuring satisfaction was then created. Finally, the instrument was pilot tested to prove its validity and reliability. The results of this effort and suggested uses of the questionnaire are reported here.computers: s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
1,032
2
57

Year Published

1989
1989
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,920 publications
(1,247 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
1,032
2
57
Order By: Relevance
“…Argument Quality (Adapted from Bailey and Pearson 1983): You think the information in the message was: Timely 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Untimely Ambiguous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Definite Uninformative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Informative Incomplete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Complete Inaccurate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Accurate…”
Section: Appendix a Quantitative Measures And Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Argument Quality (Adapted from Bailey and Pearson 1983): You think the information in the message was: Timely 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Untimely Ambiguous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Definite Uninformative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Informative Incomplete 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Complete Inaccurate 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Accurate…”
Section: Appendix a Quantitative Measures And Indicatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of IT evaluation techniques over the years have included system usage (Srinivasan, 1985;Trice & Treacy, 1986); information value (Gallagher, 1974); user satisfaction (Bailey & Pearson, 1983;Shaw et al, 2002); and service quality (Jiang et al, 2002). Hitt and Brynjolffson (1996) posit that the question of IT value is not a single one, but rather consists of several related but distinct issues such as increased productivity, i.e., is there now more output per given quantity of input?…”
Section: Maturity Of Demandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anderson and Bezuidenhoudt [3] stressed that reliability is also needed, especially in consumer electronic markets. A reliable system should have quick error recovery and ensure correct operation [10]. Thus, we propose:…”
Section: System Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%