2008
DOI: 10.1080/14623940802207451
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a tool to assess teachers’ level of reflective practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
253
0
67

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
4
253
0
67
Order By: Relevance
“…One mechanism or coaching 'skill' to facilitate this process is that of becoming a reflective practitioner, which has received significant attention in recent years (e.g. Gilbert & Trudel, 2001) and which is often proclaimed as the hallmark of professional competence (Larrivee, 2008). This research has utilised experiential learning theory and the role of the coach as experimenter (Schön, 1987) to examine coach development.…”
Section: So What Is the Solution?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One mechanism or coaching 'skill' to facilitate this process is that of becoming a reflective practitioner, which has received significant attention in recent years (e.g. Gilbert & Trudel, 2001) and which is often proclaimed as the hallmark of professional competence (Larrivee, 2008). This research has utilised experiential learning theory and the role of the coach as experimenter (Schön, 1987) to examine coach development.…”
Section: So What Is the Solution?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por su parte, Rodrigues (2013) presenta a Larrivee (2008), quien a partir de las contribuciones de Van Manen (1977), Schön (1998), Jay y Johnson (2002), entre otros, propone un modelo inicial con tres niveles de reflexión:…”
Section: Confrontaciónunclassified
“…A partir de sus investigaciones, Larrivee (2008) modifica su escala inicial de niveles de reflexión, les otorga una nueva denominación, y profundiza sus características (Rodrigues, 2013): a. Pre reflexión: Reacción a las situaciones del aula de forma automática y rutinaria, sin un análisis previo, atribuyéndose la responsabilidad de los problemas a los estudiantes o a otros. Sus creencias y posiciones acerca de las prácticas de enseñanza son generalizadas y no se apoyan en la experiencia, la teoría o la investigación.…”
Section: Confrontaciónunclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations