2011
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2011.554874
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of a wireless Plug&Lean system for improving manufacturing equipment diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It was carried out a systematic analysis of the literature, in order to identify the relationship between TPM and maintenance, aiming at the study of the major contributions of the TPM practices implementation on the operational performance of organizations toward better product quality (Costa et al, 2019;Marques et al, 2018;S a et al, 2019Santos et al, 2019a;Bravi et al, 2019) protecting the environment (Carvalho et al, 2020;Ara ujo et al, 2019;Barbosa et al, 2018;Santos et al, 2014;Bravi et al, 2020;Jim enez-Delgado et al, 2020;Talapatra et al, 2019) and consequently, achieving greater customer satisfaction (Bravi et al, 2017), creating value (Bravi et al, 2018;Santos et al, 2019b;Felix et al, 2019a;Zgodavova et al, 2020;Marinho et al, 2020) and valuing new business (Doiro et al, 2017(Doiro et al, , 2019Santos et al, 2018b;F elix et al, 2019b;Rodrigues et al, 2019) where new ideas are welcome (Santos et al, 2018a(Santos et al, , 2019cAzevedo et al, 2019), for rapid improvement (Rodrigues et al, 2020;Vieira et al, 2019;Ribeiro et al, 2019;Murmura et al, 2021). Santos et al (2011) developed a system called Plug and Lean, based on TPM, with the objective of providing a reliable diagnosis of the current state of the equipment, focusing on the display of graphical information regarding the performance restrictions of the equipment toward improvement activities, allowing the collection of data from production equipment with high precision and with less effort. The first case study took place at a company that manufactures natural wood cladding solutions where the initial variability in line availability and performance has been eliminated, with an increase in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) from 53.5% to 74.7%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was carried out a systematic analysis of the literature, in order to identify the relationship between TPM and maintenance, aiming at the study of the major contributions of the TPM practices implementation on the operational performance of organizations toward better product quality (Costa et al, 2019;Marques et al, 2018;S a et al, 2019Santos et al, 2019a;Bravi et al, 2019) protecting the environment (Carvalho et al, 2020;Ara ujo et al, 2019;Barbosa et al, 2018;Santos et al, 2014;Bravi et al, 2020;Jim enez-Delgado et al, 2020;Talapatra et al, 2019) and consequently, achieving greater customer satisfaction (Bravi et al, 2017), creating value (Bravi et al, 2018;Santos et al, 2019b;Felix et al, 2019a;Zgodavova et al, 2020;Marinho et al, 2020) and valuing new business (Doiro et al, 2017(Doiro et al, , 2019Santos et al, 2018b;F elix et al, 2019b;Rodrigues et al, 2019) where new ideas are welcome (Santos et al, 2018a(Santos et al, , 2019cAzevedo et al, 2019), for rapid improvement (Rodrigues et al, 2020;Vieira et al, 2019;Ribeiro et al, 2019;Murmura et al, 2021). Santos et al (2011) developed a system called Plug and Lean, based on TPM, with the objective of providing a reliable diagnosis of the current state of the equipment, focusing on the display of graphical information regarding the performance restrictions of the equipment toward improvement activities, allowing the collection of data from production equipment with high precision and with less effort. The first case study took place at a company that manufactures natural wood cladding solutions where the initial variability in line availability and performance has been eliminated, with an increase in Overall Equipment Effectiveness (OEE) from 53.5% to 74.7%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1, the OEE includes six big losses and divides them into three categories Q, P and A: Q means quality (i.e., to produce only good parts), P means performance (i.e., to produce as fast as possible) and A means availability (i.e., to produce without stop-times) (Nakajima, 1988). Effectiveness can be correctly measured and improved by the availability, performance and quality partial rates provided by this metric (Santos et al, 2011). However, OEE concepts definition can be adjusted for application in specific contexts (Muñoz-Villamizar et al 2018).…”
Section: Oee As a Key Performance Indicatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manufacturing companies are aware of the importance of effectively managing equipment efficiency in order to continuously improve the production process. Most losses in productivity derive from a lack of proper equipment efficiency management (Santos et al, 2011). If equipment efficiency is not correctly measured and controlled, it will be difficult for companies to be competitive.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to [7], OEE lacks a comprehensive framework for practitioners in order to systematically improve equipment performance. The framework developed by Garcia et al and Santos et al [8,9] based on OEE and the wireless technology solution for improving overall manufacturing operations is mainly driven by the two key components: the OEE indicator and continuous improvement methodology. The main contributions and values of these framework are integrated the wireless advance technology in the field of operations management to drive for continues improvement in maintenance.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%