2008
DOI: 10.1002/jgm.1233
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of adenovirus immobilization strategies for in situ gene therapy

Abstract: Background-Regenerative gene therapy using viral vectors enables transduced cells to express bioactive factors in vivo. Viral delivery with spatial control can enhance transduction efficiency and avoid systemic infection. Consequently, we tethered biotinylated adenovirus via interactions with avidin on chitosan surfaces to gain robust control for in situ transduction.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
38
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
38
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings extend previous work showing biomaterialmediated gene delivery using viral vectors (20,(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). The majority of this work demonstrated the ability to specify the spatial location of delivered vectors, rather than the induction of tissuespecific differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our findings extend previous work showing biomaterialmediated gene delivery using viral vectors (20,(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49). The majority of this work demonstrated the ability to specify the spatial location of delivered vectors, rather than the induction of tissuespecific differentiation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…An important feature of the current study includes the use of self-inactivating lentiviral vectors in place of γ-retrovirus (43), nonintegrating viral vectors (16,(40)(41)(42)55), or naked plasmid DNA (15). Although considerable progress has been made with regard to spatial control of gene delivery to cells, transient gene expression and poor transfection/transduction efficiencies may not allow sufficient control of cell phenotype and tissue development.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface tethering of gene vectors on implantable biomaterials (also termed as substrate-mediated gene delivery or solid phase gene delivery) has been implemented in cell culture and animal experiments using both specific (antigen-antibody [18][19][20] , avidin-biotin 21,22 ) and non-specific [23][24][25][26] (charge, van der Waals) interactions. The covalent attachment of vectors to the surface of the implanted device has been previously considered as non-functional since excessively strong bonds with the surface preclude vector internalization by target cells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral capsid proteins have also been modified to facilitate conjugation to material surfaces. Amine groups on chitosan surfaces were used for bioconjugation to bind virus via avidin-biotin [12] and antibody-antigen interactions [13]. Viral surfaces were covalently modified by biotin or digoxigenin while the infectivity was preserved.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Viral surfaces were covalently modified by biotin or digoxigenin while the infectivity was preserved. Compared to randomly conjugating avidin to biomaterials, immobilization of avidin onto previously biotinylated materials increases avidin orientation and therefore may result in enhanced binding efficiency [12]. The potential shortcoming of these methods, however, is that they may be limited to materials having inherent functional groups on the surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%