2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0032-5910(99)00206-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of advanced scanning electron microscopy techniques for characterization of submicron ash

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron microscopy is one of the most versatile tools for the microanalysis of individual particles. Both conventional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) ( ) and computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy (CCSEM) ( ) as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) ( ) have been widely used to characterize single coal fly ash particles. However, most of these studies have focused on micrometer and larger size particles, and data on ultrafine fly ash particles are sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Electron microscopy is one of the most versatile tools for the microanalysis of individual particles. Both conventional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) ( ) and computer-controlled scanning electron microscopy (CCSEM) ( ) as well as transmission electron microscopy (TEM) ( ) have been widely used to characterize single coal fly ash particles. However, most of these studies have focused on micrometer and larger size particles, and data on ultrafine fly ash particles are sparse.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analytical electron microscopy (AEM) is one of the most versatile tools for obtaining information about individual particles. The morphology, size and composition of micrometre and even submicrometre coal fly ash particles have been well characterized by a variety of electron microscopy techniques, including conventional scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Quann & Sarofim, 1986; Seames, 2003), computer‐controlled scanning electron microscopy (CCSEM) (Huffman et al ., 1989, 1990; Katrinak & Zygarlicke, 1995; O’Keefe et al ., 2000; Chen et al ., 2004), and conventional transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (Azar & Thomas, 1988; Qian et al ., 1988; Hurley & Schobert, 1992; Vassilev & Vassileva, 1996). However, scant information is available on ultrafine (< 100 nm) particles, which are abundant in coal fly ash PM 2.5 samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%