10th International Energy Conversion Engineering Conference 2012
DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-4055
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Ammonia Based Fuels for Environmentally Friendly Power Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Groups that have shown some development on the understanding of these systems are limited [16,18,22,23]. To the best knowledge of the authors, SPG Advanced Propulsion and Energy [18,19] are the only company claiming developments close to commercialisation. Their findings show how higher mass flow rates are required to achieve similar power outputs if compared to methane, but at the same time the outlet temperatures are lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Groups that have shown some development on the understanding of these systems are limited [16,18,22,23]. To the best knowledge of the authors, SPG Advanced Propulsion and Energy [18,19] are the only company claiming developments close to commercialisation. Their findings show how higher mass flow rates are required to achieve similar power outputs if compared to methane, but at the same time the outlet temperatures are lower.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…More recently, a number of different approaches have been followed to use ammonia as a flexible fuel in gas turbines. Karabeyoglu et al [19] present some important issues of using NH 3 , arguing that toxicity and low energy density are the major problems. In 1991, the Italian power generator ENEL undertook a research program on gas turbine challenges associated with flexibility using gaseous blends that included ammonia, citing emissions as the biggest problem [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, the low cost of fossil fuels led to the end of these programs that would be eventually re-activated a few decades later. More recently, a number of different approaches have been followed to use ammonia as a flexible fuel in gas turbines, with most of them finding that emissions are the main concern when burning ammonia directly [6][7][8][9][10]. The work from the Space Propulsion Group (SPG) [6][7] has demonstrated the challenges of the use of ammonia as fuel for propulsion gas turbines, thus leading to the development of new combustion systems based on porous materials that can efficiently burn ammonia blends, although this is achieved only at low power outputs.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…127,128 Recently, a number of studies have been performed considering NH 3 a flexible fuel for gas turbine applications. 129,130 They reported that the associated emissions with the combustion of ammonia limits the wide application of such fuel technology. The upper and lower concentrations of NH 3 by volume in air, corresponding to the upper and lower flammability limits under atmospheric conditions, were found to be 33.5% and 14.8%, respectively.…”
Section: Ammonia Combustionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…131 Preheating of the reactants resulted in wider operability limits, whereas the presence of water vapor restricts the operability limits. SPG Advanced Propulsion and Energy 129,130 is one of few companies that tried to produce commercial systems for NH 3 combustion. They presented a series of reports summarizing the challenges involved in the development of a reliable NH 3 combustion technology, including (a) slower reactivity and, accordingly, lower combustion temperature, (b) combustion instabilities, (c) vaporization approach of NH 3 for improved combustion, and (d) cracking of NH 3 upstream of the burner for enhanced burning velocity.…”
Section: Ammonia Combustionmentioning
confidence: 99%