2015
DOI: 10.1186/s40317-015-0054-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an animal-borne “sonar tag” for quantifying prey availability: test deployments on northern elephant seals

Abstract: Background: Developments in electronic tagging technologies have provided unprecedented insight into the movements and behavior of marine predators. Concurrent information on the prey of these tracked animals, however, is mostly lacking. We developed and tested a prototype autonomous echosounder (aka the sonar tag) for deployment on large marine animals intended to provide quantification of their prey fields.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This makes it difficult to assess the deeper limit of the prey patch on which the SES feed at the bottom of their dives or to test predictions about their foraging behaviour. The development of video camera [34,91,95] and miniaturized sonar loggers [96] may help to overcome these difficulties by providing information about the prey quality and extend our perception range of environment surrounding the SES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes it difficult to assess the deeper limit of the prey patch on which the SES feed at the bottom of their dives or to test predictions about their foraging behaviour. The development of video camera [34,91,95] and miniaturized sonar loggers [96] may help to overcome these difficulties by providing information about the prey quality and extend our perception range of environment surrounding the SES.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Responses observed are similar to hypothesized elephant seal behavior to escape predators by diving deeper [37], and responses to anthropogenic sound sources are not unexpected [13,44]. Responses elicited during CEEs Table 4 Mean change in depth for non-exposure and exposure dive inversions Dive inversions are defined by a change from ascending to descending >3 m over 4 s, for all dives deeper than 100 m. Standard deviation is given in parentheses, and n is given for each.…”
Section: Animal Response To Disturbancementioning
confidence: 67%
“…This is the first dedicated BRS conducted on any marine mammal using an animal-borne sound source (see [44] for incidental BRS with an active sonar tag). This approach has the potential to expand and complement current CEE methodologies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even the normal operation of tags may have unintended negative effects, as demonstrated by changes in behavior of juvenile northern elephant seals deployed with a pinging “sonar tag” (Lawson et al . ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%