A generalized bioenergetic model was used to estimate the food requirements of Steller sea lions Eumetopias jubatus in Alaska, USA. Inputs included age-and sex-specific energy requirements by date, population size and composition, and diet composition and energy content. Error in model predictions was calculated using uncertainty in parameter values and Monte Carlo simulation methods. Our model suggests that energy requirements of individuals were generally lowest in the summer breeding season (June to August) and highest in the winter (December to February) and spring (March to May) mainly due to changes in activity budgets. Predicted relative daily food requirements were highest for young animals (12 ± 3% SD and 13 ± 3% of body mass for 1 yr old males and females respectively) and decreased with age (5 ± 1% and 6 ± 1% of body mass for 14 yr old males and 22 yr old females respectively). The mean daily food requirement of pregnant females predicted by the model was only marginally greater than the predicted mean daily food requirement of non-pregnant females of the same age. However, the model suggested that the mean daily food requirement of females nursing pups was about 70% greater than females of the same age without pups. Of the 3 sets of model parameters (diet, population, and bioenergetic), uncertainty in diet and bioenergetic parameters resulted in the largest variation in model predictions. The model provides a quantitative estimate of the Steller sea lion population's food requirements and also suggests directions for future research. KEY WORDS: Bioenergetic model · Eumetopias jubatus · Food consumption · Steller sea lion · Sensitivity analysisResale or republication not permitted without written consent of the publisher Mar Ecol Prog Ser 229: 291-312, 2002 third method for estimating food consumption is bioenergetic modeling.Biological systems are governed by the laws of thermodynamics and theoretically reach steady states where energy influx is equal to energy efflux (Wiegert 1968, Galluci 1973. In reality, a true steady state is never reached in nature, but in the long term any biological system must be in energy balance such that Consumption = Feces + Urine + Respiration + Productionwhere 'Consumption' is energy ingested, 'Feces' and 'Urine' are energy egested, 'Respiration' is energy used for work (degraded to heat), and 'Production' is energy deposited as tissue growth, fat storage, eggs, sperm, embryos, exuviae etc. (Klekowski & Duncan 1975). The energy consumption of marine mammals has frequently been estimated using bioenergetic models (Hinga 1979, Naumov & Chekunova 1980, AshwellErickson & Elsner 1981, Doidge & Croxall 1985, Hiby & Harwood 1985, Lavigne et al. 1985, Worthy 1987a, Härkönen & HeideJørgensen 1991, Markussen & Øritsland 1991, Ryg & Øritsland 1991, Markussen et al. 1992, Olesiuk 1993, Ugland et al. 1993, Mohn & Bowen 1996). These models range in detail from simple equations (with few parameters) representing an average individual's annual energy consumption, to detai...

No abstract

Three Steller sea lions Eumetopias jubatus were trained to participate in free-swimming, open-ocean experiments designed to determine if activity can be used to estimate the energetic cost of finding prey at depth. Sea lions were trained to dive to fixed depths of 10 to 50 m, and to re-surface inside a floating dome to measure energy expenditure via gas exchange. A 3-axis accelerometer was attached to the sea lions during foraging. Acceleration data were used to determine the overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA), a proxy for activity. Results showed that ODBA correlated well with the diving metabolic rate (dive + surface interval) and that the variability in the relationship (r 2 = 0.47, linear regression including Sea lion as a random factor) was similar to that reported for other studies that used heart rate to estimate metabolic rate for sea lions swimming underwater in a 2 m deep water channel. A multivariate analysis suggested that both ODBA and dive duration were important for predicting diving metabolic cost, but ODBA alone predicted foraging cost to within 7% between animals. Consequently, collecting 3-dimensional acceleration data is a simple technique to estimate field metabolic rate of wild Steller sea lions and other diving mammals and birds.

We examined the digestion and passage times of bones and other hard parts from pollock, herring, salmon, and sandlance recovered from two juvenile captive Steller's sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) subjected to varying activity levels. Key bones that could be identified to species were distributed over an average of 3.2 scats (range 1–6) following a single meal, with pollock remains occurring in significantly more scats than other species. Relying on otoliths alone to determine the presence of prey resulted in significantly fewer prey being identified than if other structures were also used (such as vertebrae, jaw bones, and teeth), particularly for salmon. Using either technique, there were significant differences in the likelihood that bones would be recovered from the series of scats produced following a meal, with pollock recovery exceeding herring (by three‐fold) and sandlance (by eight‐fold). Differences between species were reduced when recovery was calculated on a per scat basis rather than over multiple scats. Active animals passed greater numbers of bones, but the overall effect on prey recovery estimates was not significant. Defecation times of prey structures from a meal were variable and ranged from an initial 2–56 h to a final 28–148 h. The time interval to pass 95% of recovered structutes varied by a factor of two among prey species, and was highest for pollock due to retention beyond 65 h.

The decline of Steller sea lions (Eumetopias jubatus) in the Gulf of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands may be the result of them eating too much pollock (a gadid fish) instead of a more balanced and diverse diet containing fattier fishes, such as herring or sandlance. We sought to test this junk-food hypothesis by feeding six captive Steller sea lions (ages 0.9-4.5 years) only pollock or herring. All sea lions gained mass while eating herring. However, eating only pollock for short periods (11-23 d) caused the study animals to lose an average of 6.5% of their initial body mass (0.6 kg/d) over an average feeding trial of 16 d (initial mass averaged 125 kg). The animals were allowed to eat as much pollock as they wanted but did not increase their food intake to compensate for the low energy they were receiving. The sea lions showed progressive metabolic depression while losing body mass on a pollock-only diet. The loss of body mass while eating pollock was due to the lower gross energy content of pollock versus herring, the higher cost of digesting pollock, and the increased energy loss from digesting the larger quantity of fish needed to compensate for the lower energy content of pollock. Thus, our sea lions would have had to eat 35-80% more pollock than herring to maintain similar net energy intakes. Results from our captive-feeding studies are consistent with the junk-food hypothesis and have serious implications for Steller sea lions that have been eating primarily pollock in the Gulf of Alaska and the Aleutian Islands. Résumé : Le déclin des Otaries de Steller (Eumetopias jubatus) dans le golfe d'Alaska et les îles Aléoutiennes est peut-être attribuable à la consommation excessive de goberge (un gadidé) au lieu d'un régime équilibré et diversifié contenant des poissons plus gras tels le hareng et le lançon. Nous avons tenté d'éprouver cette hypothèse du régime de mauvaise qualité (junk-food hypothesis) en nourrissant six Otaries de Steller en captivité (âgées de 0,9 à 4,5 ans) uniquement de goberge ou uniquement de hareng. Toutes les otaries ont subi des augmentations de masse à la consommation de hareng. Cependant, la consommation de goberge pour de courtes périodes (11-23 jours) a entraîné des pertes moyennes de 6,5 % de la masse initiale (0,6 kg par jour) au cours d'une période alimentaire d'essai de 16 jours (masse initiale moyenne de 125 kg). Les animaux pouvaient manger autant de goberge qu'ils voulaient, mais ils n'ont pas augmenté leur consommation totale pour compenser la perte d'énergie encourue. Les otaries ont subi une dépression métabolique progressive par perte de masse lorsqu'ils ont adopté le régime constitué uniquement de goberge. La perte de masse au régime de goberge est attribuable au contenu énergétique brut réduit des goberges comparativement à celui des harengs, au coût énergétique supérieur de digestion de la goberge, et à la perte énergétique plus grande encourue lors de la digestion dune quantité de poisson plus grande nécessaire pour compenser le contenu énergétique plus faible de la g...