2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2013.10.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of an empirical formula for machine classification: Prioritization of maintenance tasks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By using a multiple case study approach the phenomenon of machine criticality assessment can be studied in its natural setting and meaningful theory can be generated (Voss, Tsikriktsis, and Frohlich 2002). Additionally, the multiple case study methodology was inspired by similar research which developed an empirical formula for machine classification for prioritization of maintenance tasks (Stadnicka, Antosz, and Chandima Ratnayake 2014). The empirical formula was developed by studying three machine classifications from separate industrial cases and a generic formula was derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By using a multiple case study approach the phenomenon of machine criticality assessment can be studied in its natural setting and meaningful theory can be generated (Voss, Tsikriktsis, and Frohlich 2002). Additionally, the multiple case study methodology was inspired by similar research which developed an empirical formula for machine classification for prioritization of maintenance tasks (Stadnicka, Antosz, and Chandima Ratnayake 2014). The empirical formula was developed by studying three machine classifications from separate industrial cases and a generic formula was derived.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, a generic approach for a data-driven criticality assessment tool is proposed by synthesizing the literature presented in Chapter 2. The structure of this framework is proposed based on the inspiration from the empirical formula proposed in Stadnicka, Antosz, and Chandima Ratnayake (2014). It essentially consists of three continuous steps.…”
Section: Proposed Generic Approach Machine Criticality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model provided by Pelaez and Bowles (1994) combines qualitative and quantitative factors to determine "riskiness." Failure data are a specific requirement in many criticality assessment methods (Stadnicka et al, 2014;Bengtsson, 2011), as these are main data that directly correspond to maintenance. In other situations, purely qualitative data such as group discussion (cross-functional) with the relevant participants are used for assessment (Bengtsson, 2011;Márquez et al, 2015).…”
Section: Machine Criticality Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To evaluate the system effectiveness different evaluation criteria may be used. In the articles [15,16,19,23,27,29,34,36,37,42,43] the authors propose the criteria of a system evaluation. Different indicators are used for each of the particular criterion.…”
Section: Measures Of the Machine Operation Effectiveness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is calculated according to the formula (1). [15,16,19,23,27,29,34,36,37,42,43] No. Criterion Characteristics Exemplary indicators…”
Section: Measures Of the Machine Operation Effectiveness Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%