2009
DOI: 10.5850/jksct.2009.33.6.860
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Bi-directional Grading Method for Uniform Easy-order System -Focused on Blouse for Adult Female-

Abstract: To provide adequate fit for women over a range of sizes, the grading process should reflect their body dimensions. Current methods of creating sized garments are not addressing the need for a good or even an adequate fit for the easy-order system. This study suggests a grading rule allocating system that can improve the appropriateness of clothing for uniform easy-order system. Also, the study proposes a bi-directional grading method subdivided to horizontal and vertical direction. The grading rule allocating … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the other body measurements but the primary body measurements related to pattern grading are typically used as the dependent variables. (Schofield and LaBat, 2005a;Choi et al, 2009), although in one study, pattern size was set as the dependent variable (Chan et al, 2005). The second method is the variation method in which we use the calculated average difference of each body measurement among primary size groups categorized by certain size intervals.…”
Section: Background and Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the other body measurements but the primary body measurements related to pattern grading are typically used as the dependent variables. (Schofield and LaBat, 2005a;Choi et al, 2009), although in one study, pattern size was set as the dependent variable (Chan et al, 2005). The second method is the variation method in which we use the calculated average difference of each body measurement among primary size groups categorized by certain size intervals.…”
Section: Background and Justificationmentioning
confidence: 99%