2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2009.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of colloidal gold-based immunochromatographic assay for rapid detection of Streptococcus suis serotype 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For sensitivity, we have tested different concentrations of Leptospira culture, and the detection limit was 10 6 cells/ml. This result was almost the same as the detection limit of that achieved with the immunochromatographic assay for other bacterial species (25,37). For a specificity assay, we tested this single antibody system against several strains of Leptospira and bacteria that are commonly found in urine or are known to be the causative agents of urinary infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For sensitivity, we have tested different concentrations of Leptospira culture, and the detection limit was 10 6 cells/ml. This result was almost the same as the detection limit of that achieved with the immunochromatographic assay for other bacterial species (25,37). For a specificity assay, we tested this single antibody system against several strains of Leptospira and bacteria that are commonly found in urine or are known to be the causative agents of urinary infection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Polyclonal antibodies produced by the immunization of whole bacteria resulted in low specificity (37). By using only one kind of monoclonal antibody, we achieved better results than with a combination of polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Técnicas de isolamento de sorotipo específicas foram desenvolvidas, como a utilização de meios seletivos e diferenciais (Kataoka et al, 1991) e o isolamento imunomagnético (Gottschalk et al, 1999), além de outras técnicas sorológicas como imunofluorescência indireta (Robertson, 1985), Enzyme Linked ImmunonoSorbent Assay (ELISA) (Sepúlveda et al, 1996) e técnicas de imunocromatografia (Yang et al, 2007;Ju et al, 2010). No entanto, essas técnicas possuem sérias desvantagens, como variação nos resultados dependendo da concentração de anticorpos utilizada, baixa especificidade e incapacidade de diferenciar o sorotipo 2 do sorotipo 1/2 devido ao compartilhamento de antígenos comuns entre estes dois sorotipos (Elliot e Tai, 1978;Perch et al, 1983;Serhir et al, 1993;Sepúlveda et al, 1996;Gottschalk et al, 1999).…”
Section: Palavras-chaveunclassified
“…Lateral flow immunochromatographic assay (LFIA) is an extended application of ELISA, it is rapid, simple, and appropriate for point-of-care test (Zhang et al, 2009;Dzantiev et al, 2014). The labels used in LFIA system mainly include colloidal gold nanoparticles (Kawatsu et al, 2006;Ju et al, 2010;Preechakasedkit et al, 2012;, magnetic nanoparticles Xu et al, 2009;Wang et al, 2015a), fluorescent microspheres (Xu et al, 2013), quantum dot and so on. Compared with other labels, magnetic nanoparticles can provide a higher sensitivity , because the magnetic signals from surface and internal membrane of LFIA can be detected by a Magnetic Assay Reader (MAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%