2019
DOI: 10.3390/met9121314
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Experimental Chamber for Testing High-Temperature Hydrogen Permeation through Metal Foils

Abstract: This paper describes the methodology for conducting experiments to study hydrogen diffusion through metal membranes using a specially designed diffusion chamber of an automated gas reaction controller complex. This complex allows experiments to study hydrogen diffusion with the following parameters: the inlet hydrogen pressure is up to 50 atmospheres, and the temperature in the chamber is from 30 °C to 1000 °C. The size of the samples is limited to a diameter of 10 mm and a thickness of 100 μm. The method for … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[16]. The flux into and through the membrane is measured by a Sieverts‐type method: [ 17–19 ] hydrogen with the pressure p f (feed pressure) is applied at the feed side. The pressure is recorded continuously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16]. The flux into and through the membrane is measured by a Sieverts‐type method: [ 17–19 ] hydrogen with the pressure p f (feed pressure) is applied at the feed side. The pressure is recorded continuously.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have demonstrated a simple method to study the hydrogen gradient in hydrogen absorbing metals by probing the total hydrogen uptake and simultaneously the desorption from a partially sealed membrane. The strength of the method is the simplicity of the experimental setup, consisting of a UHVmembrane setup with established technology [27,36,37] (mass spectrometer, Sieverts method). Such a setup can be combined with additional characterization methods [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%