1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02647328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Fe-based shape memory alloys associated with face-centered cubic-hexagonal close-packed martensitic transformations: Part III. microstructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main conclusions of this study are : -When the TN temperature is above Ms (alloy B) or slightly below (alloy A) it strongly inhibits the thennal martensitic transformation by stabilization of the y phase, this have also been confirmed by electron microscopy observations [8] -The preexisting thermal martensite does not decrease the SME : for alloys A and B the SME is increased when the alloy is strained at low temperature below Ms, however little thermal martensite is present in this case. For alloy C no difference is observed for SME after deformation at 77K where about 40% thermal martensite is present or at room temperature with little thermal martensite.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The main conclusions of this study are : -When the TN temperature is above Ms (alloy B) or slightly below (alloy A) it strongly inhibits the thennal martensitic transformation by stabilization of the y phase, this have also been confirmed by electron microscopy observations [8] -The preexisting thermal martensite does not decrease the SME : for alloys A and B the SME is increased when the alloy is strained at low temperature below Ms, however little thermal martensite is present in this case. For alloy C no difference is observed for SME after deformation at 77K where about 40% thermal martensite is present or at room temperature with little thermal martensite.…”
supporting
confidence: 68%
“…It is not easy to separate the respective importance of these two aspects. Some recent results have clarified this problem.Yang et a1 [6,7,8] have precised the influence of the TN position in relation to the Ms temperature throug three alloys Fe-Mn-Si (Cr-Ni-Co-Al) : A with Ms = 300K, As = 360K and TN = 230K (TN just below Ms) B with Ms < 150K, As < 270K and TN = 260K (TN above M,) C with Ms = 340K, As = 375K and TN = 90K (TN well below Ms) All the samples are solution treated at 1300K for 1 hour and water quenched. They are submitted to bending strains at room temperature (300K) and at liquid nitrogen temperature (77K).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed discussion of this has been given by Yang and Wayman. [10] It is observed that in samples that were heat treated in the temperature range of 1000 °C to 1100 °C, the martensite occurred mostly in the thin plate morphology, though the microstructures also occasionally contained wide plates of the martensite. Interestingly, though all habit plane variants of the martensite were observed in the microstructures, there was hardly an instance of variants crossing each other.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The diffraction analysis of the SADPs obtained from the ϩ aЈ region given in Figure 8 by other researchers. [10,19] The stress-induced martensite occurs essentially at the intersections of martensite plates. [10] On the other hand, in the present case, the aЈ martensite occurs as large individual plates that span the entire width of the parent martensite plates.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These steels have the capacity to recover its original shape by the reverse transformation of stress induced ε martensite [1][2][3][4] . Some factors that influence in the capacity of shape memory recovery have been studied, such as the amount of pre-strain, thermomechanical training, alloying elements, deformation temperature and annealing temperature [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%