2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.mcp.2017.06.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of field-applicable tests for rapid and sensitive detection of Candidatus Phytoplasma oryzae

Abstract: Napier grass Stunt Disease (NSD) is a severe disease of Napier grass (Pennisetum purpureum) in Eastern Africa, caused by the leafhopper-transmitted bacterium Candidatus Phytoplasma oryzae. The pathogen severely impairs the growth of Napier grass, the major fodder for dairy cattle in Eastern Africa. NSD is associated with biomass losses of up to 70% of infected plants. Diagnosis of NSD is done by nested PCR targeting the phytoplasma DNA, which is difficult to perform in developing countries with little infrastr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The former is to mix all the RPA reagents to initiate the reaction, the latter is to prevent from local depletion of the reaction reagents, thereby increasing the reaction rate. Wambua et al 79 reported that threshold fluorescence values were reached in 5-8 minutes when agitation was performed after 4 minutes, whereas the time to reach detectable levels ranged between 8 and 14 minutes without this agitation. In addition, constant shaking throughout the RPA reaction has been shown to further accelerate the RPA reaction rate, achieve more stable positive results and improve sensitivity, especially when the template concentration is close to the limit of detection.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperature and Agitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The former is to mix all the RPA reagents to initiate the reaction, the latter is to prevent from local depletion of the reaction reagents, thereby increasing the reaction rate. Wambua et al 79 reported that threshold fluorescence values were reached in 5-8 minutes when agitation was performed after 4 minutes, whereas the time to reach detectable levels ranged between 8 and 14 minutes without this agitation. In addition, constant shaking throughout the RPA reaction has been shown to further accelerate the RPA reaction rate, achieve more stable positive results and improve sensitivity, especially when the template concentration is close to the limit of detection.…”
Section: Influence Of Temperature and Agitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…200 words, to perform RPA amplification directly from the crude sample (in the same tube). RPA has been able to amplify nucleic acids directly from crude samples, such as plant tissue extract, 111,203 crude sap, 79,112 soil and water samples, 71 food samples (eggs and chicken meat) 119 and vaginal swab lysate. 137 Nevertheless, Choi and co-workers were the first to demonstrate a fully integrated RPA assay on foil-based microfluidics that was facilitated by the one-step assay approach.…”
Section: One-step Rpa Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides maceration, extraction buffers have been employed to release nucleic acid from leaf disks (Si Ammour et al, 2017;Silva et al, 2018). Moreover, squeezed sap has been directly utilized for RPA (Wambua et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, serologic detection of phytoplasmas using specific antiserum was used as an economical and convenient method that allows analysis of many samples within a short time period [13]. Phytoplasma specific antibodies were first produced in 1974, with the use of a partially purified phytoplasma preparation as the immunogen [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, serologic detection of phytoplasmas using specific antiserum was used as an economical and convenient method that allows analysis of many samples within a short time period [13]. Phytoplasma specific antibodies were first produced in 1974, with the use of a partially purified phytoplasma preparation as the immunogen [13,14]. Since then, enriched or partially purified phytoplasma preparations from infected plants have been used to raise polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies against several phytoplasma strains [13,15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%