1952
DOI: 10.1044/jshd.1703.321
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development Of Materials For Speech Audiometry

Abstract: 165 and panels in which frequent change of personnel is 141 customarily experienced. References [ 11 H. M. Moser and J. J. Dreher, "Effects of training on [6] listeners in intelligibility studies," J. Acoust. SOC. Arne?. , [ 21 C. W. ituckey, "InvestiqFtion of the precision of an artic-[7] ulatlon testme Dromam. Abstract-This paper discusses the theoretical basis for representation of a speech signal by its short-time Fourier transform. The results of the theoretical studies were used t o design a speech analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
241
1
9

Year Published

1954
1954
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 383 publications
(254 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
241
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…A 3-month hearing aid trial provided no benefit. Word recognition testing conducted at the time resulted in scores of 0 % on all of the following tests: spondee recognition, Northwestern University #6 words (Tillman and Carhart 1966), and Central Institute of the Deaf sentences (Hirsh et al 1952).…”
Section: Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 3-month hearing aid trial provided no benefit. Word recognition testing conducted at the time resulted in scores of 0 % on all of the following tests: spondee recognition, Northwestern University #6 words (Tillman and Carhart 1966), and Central Institute of the Deaf sentences (Hirsh et al 1952).…”
Section: Subjectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The speech material was the "Auditec of Saint Louis" recording made by a male talker reading words from four CID W-22 lists (Hirsh et al, 1952). Each list consists of 50 phonemically balanced, monosyllabic English words.…”
Section: Speech Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, SII (ANSI, 1997) has different importance functions for nonsensical syllables and monosyllabic words (NU-6, Northwestern University Auditory Test No. 6, Tillman & Carhart, 1966;CID W-22, Central Institute for the Deaf, Hirsh et al, 1952;DRT, Diagnostic Rhyme Test, Fair2banks, 1958;and MRT, Modified Rhyme Test, House, Williams, Hecker, & Kryter, 1963) and short passages (CST, Connected Speech Test, Cox, Alexander, & Gilmore, 1987, and SPIN, Speech Perception in Noise, Kalikow, Stevens, & Elliott, 1977). There is an option to adjust SII, depending on the vocal effort of the talker.…”
Section: Existing Objective Measures Of Speech Intelligibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Однако наиболее широкое распространение получили словесные таблицы, представляющие собой группы из от-дельных 20-50 одно-или многосложных слов. В связи с тем, что большая часть речевого общения в повседневной жизни предполагает использование смысловых предло-жений со сложными грамматическими структурами, был разработан фразовый тест [3]. В наши дни фразовые тесты находят свое применение главным образом при услож-ненной речевой аудиометрии (для уточнения топики по-…”
unclassified