2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2014.08.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of new population-averaged standard templates for spatial normalization and segmentation of MR images for postnatal piglet brains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the existing two piglet T1 templates, this T1 template includes higher GM/WM contrast retaining more detailed information than the one from Conrad et al (2014) and is more comprehensive, including both the optic chiasm and olfactory bulb, relative to the one generated by Gan et al (2014) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the existing two piglet T1 templates, this T1 template includes higher GM/WM contrast retaining more detailed information than the one from Conrad et al (2014) and is more comprehensive, including both the optic chiasm and olfactory bulb, relative to the one generated by Gan et al (2014) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A standard coordinate system is important for brain research, where reported brain locations could be easily compared across studies and imaging modalities. In order to maintain consistency with other templates ( Felix et al, 1999 ; Watanabe et al, 2001 ; Saikali et al, 2010 ; Conrad et al, 2014 ; Gan et al, 2014 ), we set the same origin at the anterior limit of the posterior commissure in the midsagittal plane. This eases the comparison of results from studies with different templates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Numerous such templates have been developed over the years for this purpose in humans (Fonov et al, 2009), non-human primate species (Quallo et al, 2010;Frey et al, 2011), dogs (Nitzsche et al, 2019), cats (Stolzberg et al, 2017), sheep (Nitzsche et al, 2015), and rodents (Bai et al, 2012;Papp et al, 2014). Several MRI-based brain atlases have been created for the pig model (Watanabe et al, 2001;Saikali et al, 2010;Conrad et al, 2014;Gan et al, 2014;Zhong et al, 2016), although with important limitations for the abovementioned use case. Most previous templates have been created in neonatal piglets (3-6 weeks old) for use as a neurodevelopmental model (Conrad et al, 2014;Gan et al, 2014;Zhong et al, 2016), with significant morphological differences to the sexuallymature pig brain (Conrad et al, 2012;Zhong et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%