2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40830-020-00296-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Nickel-Rich Nickel–Titanium–Hafnium Alloys for Tribological Applications

Abstract: The effects of various heat treatments on the microstructure and hardness of new Ni56Ti41Hf3 and Ni56Ti36Hf8 (atomic %) alloys were studied to evaluate the suitability of these materials for tribological applications. A solid-solution strengthening effect due to Hf atoms was observed for the solution annealed (SA) Ni56Ti36Hf8 alloy (716 HV), resulting in a comparable hardness to the Ni56Ti41Hf3 alloy containing 54 vol.% of Ni4Ti3 precipitates (707 HV). In the Ni56Ti41Hf3 alloy, the maximum hardness (752 HV), a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
(108 reference statements)
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure documents HRTEM analysis that shows the atomic nature of an interface, including the presence of dislocations, whereas Figure shows electron back‐scattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis that revealed an ≈2° misorientation of the lattice within the microband relative to the parent grain. While the spacing of interfacial dislocations is consistent with previous observations under quasi‐static deformation in which martensite was retained within the bands, [ 20 ] suggesting that perhaps they are geometrically necessary austenite–martensite interfacial dislocations formed during phase transformation, the crystallographic misorientation must result from some irreversible processes that occur due to the shock loading, such as higher amounts of dislocation activity due to slip interactions that result in dissolution of Ni 4 Ti 3 precipitates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Figure documents HRTEM analysis that shows the atomic nature of an interface, including the presence of dislocations, whereas Figure shows electron back‐scattered diffraction (EBSD) analysis that revealed an ≈2° misorientation of the lattice within the microband relative to the parent grain. While the spacing of interfacial dislocations is consistent with previous observations under quasi‐static deformation in which martensite was retained within the bands, [ 20 ] suggesting that perhaps they are geometrically necessary austenite–martensite interfacial dislocations formed during phase transformation, the crystallographic misorientation must result from some irreversible processes that occur due to the shock loading, such as higher amounts of dislocation activity due to slip interactions that result in dissolution of Ni 4 Ti 3 precipitates.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…[ 18,19 ] One reason is that the small Hf addition suppresses brittle Ni 3 Ti intermetallic precipitation. [ 20 ] Here, we show that this material also enhanced characteristics in response to shock loading when compared with previously studied NiTi SMAs; analysis of the microstructure and mechanical response of this alloy after undergoing 300–650 m s −1 shock loading reveals the mechanistic understanding as to why.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…43 In similar studies, researchers have noted that nanoscale Ni 4 Ti 3 precipitation is inevitable in Nirich NiTi alloys after aging heat treatment and that the hardness value increases in nanoscale Ni 4 Ti 3 precipitates with high-volume ratios. 44,45 In this study, the low-value hardness measured in the samples after the tensile test was attributed to changes in their Ni and Ti ratios. In order to reach maximum hardness in NiTi alloys, 55-56% Ni…”
Section: Evaluation Of Tensile and Hardness Testsmentioning
confidence: 74%