2015
DOI: 10.1002/jat.3234
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of novel in vitro photosafety assays focused on the Keap1–Nrf2–ARE pathway

Abstract: Although photoallergens require UV energy for antigen formation, the subsequent immune response is considered to be the same as in ordinary skin sensitization. Therefore, in vitro tests for skin sensitization should also be applicable for photoallergy testing. In this study, we examined whether activation of the Keap1 (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1)-Nrf2 (nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2)-ARE (antioxidant response element) pathway could be used to assess the photoallergenic potential of chemic… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A novel in vitro photosafety assay was developed to evaluate potential photoallergens and phototoxicants using AREc32 and KeratinoSens reporter cell lines [231] . Chemicals that are photoallergens/photoxicans activate the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway when exposed to UV radiation.…”
Section: Applications Based On Aresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A novel in vitro photosafety assay was developed to evaluate potential photoallergens and phototoxicants using AREc32 and KeratinoSens reporter cell lines [231] . Chemicals that are photoallergens/photoxicans activate the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway when exposed to UV radiation.…”
Section: Applications Based On Aresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the alternative in vitro skin sensitization method integrates the results of multiple alternative methods involving different key events, the photo‐antioxidant response element (photo‐ARE) assay for key event 2 (Tsujita‐Inoue et al, ), photo‐hCLAT for key event 3 (Toyoda & Itagaki, ) and photo‐ADRA were compared. Photo‐hCLAT could not be compared because of the small number of chemicals evaluated for photoallergy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Photo‐hCLAT could not be compared because of the small number of chemicals evaluated for photoallergy. Using the photo‐ARE assay, Tsujita‐Inoue et al () evaluated photoallergy potential of 30 chemicals, 26 of which were common with photo‐ADRA. p ‐Phenylenediamine contained in 26 chemicals was judged negative by photo‐ADRA; however, the average value of depletion measured by normal ADRA without photoirradiation was already 86% and the depletion value was already high before photoirradiation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vitro skin sensitization ARE-Nrf2 luciferase test, a reporter gene assay using the KeratinoSensTM test method (reporter cell line), measuring cell culture keratinocytes activation through activation of the Keap1-Nrf2-ARE pathway (Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1)-Nrf2 (nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2)-ARE) as a response for oxidative/electrophilic stress, an important cellular defense mechanism, can be useful for predicting its potential skin sensitization properties [58,59]. Further studies show its potential application to photosafety testing assessments [60]. The h-CLAT, this time studying and measuring dendritic cell activation, is another useful method [61][62][63].…”
Section: General Requirements For the Assessment Of Toxicological Datamentioning
confidence: 99%