Proceedings of 2012 National Conference on Information Technology and Computer Science 2012
DOI: 10.2991/citcs.2012.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Python-based ArcGIS Tools for Spatially Balanced Forest Sampling Design

Abstract: The current forest survey sampling methods are based on classical statistics, can not solve the problems of close spatial autocorrelation and poor adaptability. General randomized tessellation stratified (GRTS), a commonly used algorithm to implement spatial balanced sampling (SBS) has gained popularity since 1997. In this paper, Python was used to make ArcGIS Tools for GRTS, followed by a case study of forest biodiversity computer simulation sampling in Hunan Province. To compare the performance of SBS with s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 3 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, it has been used to determine bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) population status through counts in basins of the Columbia River Plateau in the USA (Jacobs et al, 2009) and to develop ArcGIS tools via a forest biodiversity survey in a case study in Hunan Province, China (Li et al, 2012). Here, we illustrate the use of GRTS, and provide a comparison with StRS for bivalve surveys.…”
Section: Monitoring Surveys: Classical Methodology and New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, it has been used to determine bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) population status through counts in basins of the Columbia River Plateau in the USA (Jacobs et al, 2009) and to develop ArcGIS tools via a forest biodiversity survey in a case study in Hunan Province, China (Li et al, 2012). Here, we illustrate the use of GRTS, and provide a comparison with StRS for bivalve surveys.…”
Section: Monitoring Surveys: Classical Methodology and New Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%