“…The simplicity and sensitivity of PCR have led this technique to be used for routine viroid diagnosis; however, false positives due to amplicon contamination, and false negatives due to the failure to generate a cDNA of suitable size during reverse transcription are not infrequent. Recently, some improvements have been made in the method to reduce the effects of contamination, such as LAMP (loop-mediated isothermal amplification) and real-time PCR procedures (Boonham et al, 2004;Boubourakas et al, 2009;Monger et al, 2010;Luigi and Faggioli, 2011); however, the cost of these methods is substantially higher. In contrast, molecular hybridization using DIG-labeled probe offers a highly dependable diagnostic method that has become attractive for routine diagnosis due to the advantages of low-cost and practicality in recent years (Herranz et al, 2005;Cohen et al, 2006;Aparicio et al, 2008;Lin et al, 2011;Zhang et al, 2012).…”