1997
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1996.0134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Questionnaires to Measure Psychosocial Influences on Children's Physical Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
224
2
13

Year Published

2000
2000
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 253 publications
(244 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
5
224
2
13
Order By: Relevance
“…The support seeking factor contained two self-efficacy task items, "I think I can be physically active most days after school" and "I think I have the skills I need to be physically active" with several proxy efficacy items, such as "I think I can ask my parent or other adult to take me to a physical activity or sport practice." It is interesting that in our study the task self-efficacy item loaded with the barrier items but in the Saunders and colleagues study, 17 the task self-efficacy items loaded on the support seeking factor. It may be that the two task items loaded on this factor because the support seeking scale in the Saunders study was the first factor explaining the largest variance in the model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The support seeking factor contained two self-efficacy task items, "I think I can be physically active most days after school" and "I think I have the skills I need to be physically active" with several proxy efficacy items, such as "I think I can ask my parent or other adult to take me to a physical activity or sport practice." It is interesting that in our study the task self-efficacy item loaded with the barrier items but in the Saunders and colleagues study, 17 the task self-efficacy items loaded on the support seeking factor. It may be that the two task items loaded on this factor because the support seeking scale in the Saunders study was the first factor explaining the largest variance in the model.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…If there were more than two task items in the Saunders study, 17 then they may have found that the support seeking scale only included proxy agency items and self-efficacy was an independent scale. Subsequent recent research on the Saunders and colleagues 17 scale established a unidimensional seven-item version for high school girls. 14,24 A number of studies have demonstrated that an unidimensional self-efficacy measure is a useful tool to contribute to the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hypothesized psychosocial determinants of physical activity included physical activity selfef®cacy, social norms regarding physical activity, and beliefs regarding physical activity outcomes. The physical activity self-ef®cacy, social in¯uence and belief scales were modeled on the measurement scales developed by Saunders et al 35 Responses to each item were recorded on three-point scales (yes, no and not sure). A brief description of these scales and their associated reliability coef®cients (Cronbach's a) is provided in Table 1.…”
Section: Determinants Of Physical Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carefully planned and collected process evaluation data are then used to help clarify relationships among theoretical constructs and enhance understanding of program effects by linking intervention exposure to study outcomes [8,43,[47][48][49][50]. An overview of the study measures are provided in Table 3 (primary outcome) and 4 (cognitive and motivational mediators) [51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. These are the outputs that are presented in the logic model.…”
Section: Approach To Process Evaluation and Assessment Of Mediators Amentioning
confidence: 99%