2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of ramp up design workflow on CFETR Integrated Design Platform

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[17,18] This study designs and optimizes the magnetic diagnostics layout for the reconstruction of the equilibrium of the plasma according to the scientific objectives, engineering design parameters, and limitations of the CFETR. According to the CFETR discharge simulation, [19] the magnetic measurement data of the complete discharge was simulated by EFIT code, and the consistent plasma equilibrium was reconstructed accordingly, which verified the effectiveness of the magnetic diagnostics layout design. On this basis, the TSVD method is used to optimize the number and location of magnetic diag-nostics, and the redundancy reliability of the design is verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[17,18] This study designs and optimizes the magnetic diagnostics layout for the reconstruction of the equilibrium of the plasma according to the scientific objectives, engineering design parameters, and limitations of the CFETR. According to the CFETR discharge simulation, [19] the magnetic measurement data of the complete discharge was simulated by EFIT code, and the consistent plasma equilibrium was reconstructed accordingly, which verified the effectiveness of the magnetic diagnostics layout design. On this basis, the TSVD method is used to optimize the number and location of magnetic diag-nostics, and the redundancy reliability of the design is verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The Tokamak Simulation Code (TSC) can be used to simulate the time-dependent plasma performance in different phases of the discharge, including ramp-up, flat-top, and rampdown. [19,20] CFETR has a variety of discharge parameters with different power levels, and in this paper, the 200-MW operating scenario in Table 1 of Ref. [2] is selected, in a flat-top slice (t = 50 s, I p = 10 MA, β p = 0.081, and l i = 1.02) for validation.…”
Section: Optimizing the Number Of Magnetic Diagnostics Based On Tsvdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With experimental conditions (temperature, density, current and equilibrium information) provided from TSC, ONETWO [24] can call various code packages to compute the power deposition and current drive profiles of auxiliary heating and return them back to TSC. The converged results can be obtained by iteration with standardized data exchanges and iteration criterions in the scenario design workflow on the CFETR integrated design platform [12]. The NB source model is the Monte Carlo code NUBEAM [25].…”
Section: Computational Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CFETR geometry structures including coils and passive structures have been built as a digital tokamak in the TSC (as shown in figure 1). The corresponding 3D structures are shown in [12]. The constructed geometry structures are based on the CFETR conceptual design [1,28], which is available on CFETR Integrated design platform.…”
Section: Physic Models and Scenario Assumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation