2011
DOI: 10.5112/jjlp.52.263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Reading Fluency and Cognitive Abilities Related to Reading Fluency for Normal Child Development-Fundamental Study to Evaluate Developmental Dyslexia-

Abstract: Abstract:We investigated the typical development of reading fluency by measuring the speed of reading aloud, and the factors responsible for reading fluency. The participants for

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is unclear whether kanji word writing accuracy can be predicted by naming speed and receptive vocabulary because no studies have investigated this. In contrast, visual skills do not predict the reading fluency of Japanese monolingual children for any kinds of stimuli (Haruhara et al, 2011). According to Haruhara et al (2011), phonological skills, naming speed, and receptive vocabulary are significant predictors of children's speed in reading kana words and text.…”
Section: Predictions From the Cognitive Perspectivementioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is unclear whether kanji word writing accuracy can be predicted by naming speed and receptive vocabulary because no studies have investigated this. In contrast, visual skills do not predict the reading fluency of Japanese monolingual children for any kinds of stimuli (Haruhara et al, 2011). According to Haruhara et al (2011), phonological skills, naming speed, and receptive vocabulary are significant predictors of children's speed in reading kana words and text.…”
Section: Predictions From the Cognitive Perspectivementioning
confidence: 81%
“…In contrast, visual skills do not predict the reading fluency of Japanese monolingual children for any kinds of stimuli (Haruhara et al, 2011). According to Haruhara et al (2011), phonological skills, naming speed, and receptive vocabulary are significant predictors of children's speed in reading kana words and text. The former two skills also predict children's reading speed for kana non-words.…”
Section: Predictions From the Cognitive Perspectivementioning
confidence: 81%
“…Non‐word stimuli were created by replacing a letter cluster (CVC or CV) used in the word stimuli. Considering that previous exposure to the paragraph might affect results, we used an unfamiliar paragraph originally developed by Haruhara, Uno, Asahi, Kaneko and Awaya () for the paragraph fluency test. The paragraph was adapted to the characteristics of Hangul writing form and can be read accurately by preschoolers.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies in Japanese have also shown that (1) phonological awareness is associated with word and nonword reading in hiragana, but its role may be relatively limited and developmentally transient Ogino et al, 2017); (2) RAN plays an important role in fluency development for both words and nonwords (Haruhara, Uno, Asahi, Kaneko, & Awaya, 2011;Wakamiya et al, 2011);…”
Section: Predictors Of Word and Nonword Reading Fluencymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Previous studies in Japanese have also shown that (1) phonological awareness is associated with word and nonword reading in hiragana, but its role may be relatively limited and developmentally transient (Inoue, Georgiou, Muroya, Maekawa, & Parrila, 2017; Ogino et al, 2017); (2) RAN plays an important role in fluency development for both words and nonwords (Haruhara, Uno, Asahi, Kaneko, & Awaya, 2011; Wakamiya et al, 2011); (3) phonological memory is associated with word and nonword reading in hiragana, particularly at the initial stage of reading development (Inomata, Uno, & Haruhara, 2013; Kakihana, Ando, Koyama, Iitaka, & Sugawara, 2009); and (4) morphological awareness contributes to early word and nonword reading skills in hiragana (Muroya et al, 2017).…”
Section: Growth Of Word and Nonword Reading In Alphabetic Orthographiesmentioning
confidence: 99%