2010
DOI: 10.1021/ie101356c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Self-Validating Soft Sensors Using Fast Moving Window Partial Least Squares

Abstract: In the development of soft sensors for an industrial process, the colinearity of the predictor variables and the time-varying nature of the process need to be addressed. In many industrial applications, the partial least-squares (PLS) has been proven to capture the linear relationship between input and output variables for a local operating region; therefore, the PLS model needs to be adapted to accommodate the time-varying nature of the process. In this paper, a fast moving window algorithm is derived to upda… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparison purpose, the performance of several state-of-the-art and commonly used PLS based adaptive soft sensing methods was also provided and analyzed. These benchmark methods consist of the recursive PLS (RPLS) [Qin, 1998], the locally weighted PLS (LWPLS) [Kano and Fujiwara, 2013], the moving window PLS (MWPLS) [Liu et al, 2010] and the localized adaptive soft sensor (LASS) [Ni et al, 2014]. The estimation accuracy is evaluated on the test dataset by several commonly used error indexes including the root mean squares error (RMSE), the relative RMSE (RRMSE) and the maximum absolute error (MAE), which are defined as …”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For comparison purpose, the performance of several state-of-the-art and commonly used PLS based adaptive soft sensing methods was also provided and analyzed. These benchmark methods consist of the recursive PLS (RPLS) [Qin, 1998], the locally weighted PLS (LWPLS) [Kano and Fujiwara, 2013], the moving window PLS (MWPLS) [Liu et al, 2010] and the localized adaptive soft sensor (LASS) [Ni et al, 2014]. The estimation accuracy is evaluated on the test dataset by several commonly used error indexes including the root mean squares error (RMSE), the relative RMSE (RRMSE) and the maximum absolute error (MAE), which are defined as …”
Section: Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These drifts may result from catalyst deactivation, mechanical ageing, change of operating conditions, variation of feed properties, or even climatic change, et al Therefore, developing adaptive soft sensors to adapt them to new process dynamics automatically is necessary for prolonging their life time in industrial applications. Moving window (MW) models [Kaneko et al, 2009;Zhang et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2010], recursive models [Dayal and MacGregor, 1997;Qin, 1998;Tang et al, 2012a;Shao et al, 2012] and just-in-time learning (JITL) models [Chen et al, 2009;Kim et al, 2013b;Liu et al, 2012;Liu and Chen, 2013;Fujiwara et al, 2009] are commonly applied to achieve such target and successful applications of these methods have been reported. However, there are some limitations associated with these methods that need to be analyzed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These benchmark methods included the least squares SVM (LSSVM) [49] based design, the conventional distance based JITL PLS (JITLPLS) [47], the recursive PLS (RPLS) [19], the moving window PLS (MWPLS) [18] and the CoJIT [21].…”
Section: Two Case Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e proposed method was applied to an industrial grinding circuit. Liu et al (2010) proposed fast moving window PLS (FMWPLS) based on the dissimilarities between the new and oldest data that were incorporated into the kernel algorithm for PLS, FMW-PLS was applied to oxygen concentration estimation in an air separation process. proposed the incremental local learning so sensing algorithm (ILLSA) by exploiting the local learning framework and applied it to a polymerization reactor.…”
Section: Changes In Process Characteristics and Operatingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, Liu et al (2010) extended this reconstruction-based approach to the case of multiple sensor failures. Since a moving window approach including their FMW-PLS is sensitive to outliers, the con dence intervals of predictions, which were derived from the uncertainties of the output and input variables, were created to avoid inferential models being misled by abrupt noise from the online analyzers.…”
Section: Reliability Of Soft-sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%