1998
DOI: 10.1353/aad.2012.0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of Text Structure Knowledge as Assessed by Spoken and Signed Retellings of a Deaf Second-Grade Student

Abstract: Encouraged by research documenting improved reading comprehension when the components of text structure are realized by students who are deaf or hard of hearing (e.g., Kluwin & Papalia, 1989; Schirmer & Bond, 1990), the researchers analyzed 28 texts retold by the same second-grade deaf child. Methodology provided for analysis of transcripts of the child's weekly text retellings across a Baseline Phase, Intervention Phase 1, and Intervention Phase 2 of data collection. Initially, stimulus for the retell… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, researchers anticipated that these children would identify fewer key story elements than their peers with typical hearing. Prior research has, in fact, reported deficits in the narrative abilities of children with hearing loss, specifically noting that their story retells lacked important key elements (Luetke-Stahlman, Griffiths, & Montgomery, 1998). Although in the present study the performance of children with hearing loss was slightly poorer than that of the matched group, the difference was not significant, suggesting that children with and without hearing loss are similarly able to supply target word(s) within a cloze test structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, researchers anticipated that these children would identify fewer key story elements than their peers with typical hearing. Prior research has, in fact, reported deficits in the narrative abilities of children with hearing loss, specifically noting that their story retells lacked important key elements (Luetke-Stahlman, Griffiths, & Montgomery, 1998). Although in the present study the performance of children with hearing loss was slightly poorer than that of the matched group, the difference was not significant, suggesting that children with and without hearing loss are similarly able to supply target word(s) within a cloze test structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, researchers anticipated that these children would identify fewer key story elements than their peers with typical hearing. Prior research has, in fact, reported deficits in the narrative abilities of children with hearing loss, specifically noting that their story retells lacked important key elements (Luetke-Stahlman, Griffiths, & Montgomery, 1998). Although in the present study the performance of children with hearing loss was slightly poorer than that of the matched group, the difference was not significant, suggesting that children with and without hearing loss are similarly able to supply target word(s) within a cloze test structure.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 76%
“…Retelling has commonly been studied and used as a valid assessment tool for measuring comprehension of stories that students read or stories that were read to them (Gillman & Carlile, 1997;Isbell, Sobol, Lindauer, & Lowrance, 2004;Luetke-Stahlman, Griffiths, & Montgomery, 1998;Mandler & Johnson, 1977;Roberts, Good, & Corcoran, 2005;Robertson, Dow, & Hainzinger, 2006;Stein & Glenn, 1979;Sudweeks, Glissmeyer, Morrison, Wilcox, & Tanner, 2004;Thorndyke, 1977). Some researchers, however, have explored the use of retelling as a learning strategy for comprehending text.…”
Section: Retellingmentioning
confidence: 99%