2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11423-020-09824-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the digital and socio-civic skills (DIGISOC) questionnaire

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
37
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
3
37
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The result also shows that the participants have a high awareness of the concept of DC particularly with digital health and safety and digital etiquette. This is the same as what was confirmed by Walters et al (2019); Peart et al (2020). The results show that participants are aware of the physical effects of sustained use of ICTs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The result also shows that the participants have a high awareness of the concept of DC particularly with digital health and safety and digital etiquette. This is the same as what was confirmed by Walters et al (2019); Peart et al (2020). The results show that participants are aware of the physical effects of sustained use of ICTs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Compared to previous quantitative studies (e.g., Alarcón et al, 2020 ; Kong et al, 2019 ; Peart et al, 2020 ; Suwanroj et al, 2019 ; Touron et al, 2018 ; etc.) the present study is the only one presenting a hybrid approach where both PLS-SEM and CB-SEM approaches are implemented for CFA of scale validation.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Furthermore, contrary to previous studies that suggested too short (e.g., Lee et al, 2015 ) or quite long (e.g., Peart et al, 2020 ; Touron et al, 2018 ) instruments, the SDiCoS proposes a comprehensive model of six components and 28 items, providing a practical and easy to use instrument for future research on students’ DC. SDiCoS includes all the essential components as derived from previous popular frameworks, being adjusted to the present technological trends.…”
Section: Discussion Implications and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A search in the databases also provides the number of quotes of each category that has any of the ten scales found, with 151 mentions in Google Scholar and 58 in Scopus by Jones and Mitchell [19] followed with 90 and 27 quotes, respectively, by Choi, Glassman, and Cristol [20]. The next column of Table 2 provides information on the recipients to whom the instrument was administered in its first application, mostly to university students or recent graduates [21][22][23], to adolescent or secondary school students [19,26,28], and to teachers [25,27]. Some technical and psychometric properties of the scales are also shown, such as the samples, small and random in all cases; characteristics of the instruments, between 8 and 59 items and between 2 and 7 response options; and the reliability of the scales using Cronbach's alpha, always above 0.70.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%