In humans and other mammals, the hippocampus is critical for episodic memory, the autobiographical record of events, including where and when they happen. When one records from hippocampal pyramidal neurons in awake, behaving rodents, their most obvious firing correlate is the animal's position within a particular environment, earning them the name "place cells." When an animal explores a novel environment, its pyramidal neurons form their spatial receptive fields over a matter of minutes and are generally stable thereafter. This experience-dependent stabilization of place fields is therefore an attractive candidate neural correlate of the formation of hippocampal memory. However, precisely how the animal's experience of a context translates into stable place fields remains largely unclear. For instance, we still do not know whether observation of a space is sufficient to generate a stable hippocampal representation of that space because the animal must physically visit a spot to demonstrate which cells fire there. We circumvented this problem by comparing the relative stability of place fields of directly experienced space from merely observed space following blockade of NMDA receptors, which preferentially destabilizes newly generated place fields. This allowed us to determine whether place cells stably represent parts of the environment the animal sees, but does not actually occupy. We found that the formation of stable place fields clearly requires direct experience with a space. This suggests that place cells are part of an autobiographical record of events and their spatial context, consistent with providing the "where" information in episodic memory.learning | plasticity | cognitive map | remapping | consolidation T he hippocampus is clearly central to mammalian learning and memory (1), and it is just as clear that an animal's position in space is by far the most obvious firing correlate of hippocampal neurons in awake, behaving rodents (2). However, the precise relationship between memory and place cells is less clear, making the study of the processes governing the formation of place fields particularly interesting. Consistent with the central role for the hippocampus in memory, the balance of experimental evidence supports the idea that place fields are constructed and stabilized by the animal's experience of that space. For example, place cells "remap" (i.e., change to unpredictable locations and/or change their firing rate) in response to even small changes in the sensory environment (3) or even changes in the animal's ongoing behavior (4, 5). Moreover, place fields are quite labile in novel environments until the animal has experienced the environment for several minutes (6, 7). Finally, inhibitors of synaptic plasticity prevent the long-term maintenance (i.e., destabilize) of place fields in novel but not familiar environments (8, 9).However, recent studies have forced a reexamination of the debate. First, place cells in weanling rats show some adult-like spatial tuning during the animals' first sp...