2021
DOI: 10.3103/s1052618821080100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the Hole-Drilling Method as Applied to the Study of Inhomogeneous Residual Stress Fields

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It was found that the residual stress of the coating at all thicknesses was tensile stress, and the bonding layer did not seem to affect the stress field. The advantage of drilling method is that the technology is mature, and the principle and operation are simple, but its measurement accuracy is easily affected by external test conditions, such as strain gauge sticking manners, drilling depth and so on, which will have a great impact on the accuracy of the measurement results [76].…”
Section: Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that the residual stress of the coating at all thicknesses was tensile stress, and the bonding layer did not seem to affect the stress field. The advantage of drilling method is that the technology is mature, and the principle and operation are simple, but its measurement accuracy is easily affected by external test conditions, such as strain gauge sticking manners, drilling depth and so on, which will have a great impact on the accuracy of the measurement results [76].…”
Section: Stress Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most popular methods rely on successive layer removals from plate or beam specimens Treuting and Read (1951); Hospers and Vogelesang (1975); Jiang et al (2011); Dreier and Denkena (2014), on slitting Cheng and Finnie (2007); Salehi et al (2020), slotting Olson et al (2022) or cracking Prime and Hill (2002). The hole drilling method is probably the least destructive one Gao and Shang (2009); Baldi (2014Baldi ( , 2019; Razumovskii and Usov (2021), because the diameter of the hole can potentially be small. Even a standard is available for this technique ASTM (2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В проблеме оценки ресурса современных инженерных систем в связи с усложнением технологических процессов, в том числе методов поверхностного упрочнения, задачи расчетно-экспериментального определения остаточных напряжений не теряют своей актуальности. В силу сложностей моделирования случайных процессов нагружения на стадии производства сохраняется необходимость применения экспериментальных методов определения полей деформаций и перемещений и методов идентификации поля остаточных напряжений на основе этих данных путем решения обратных задач механики деформируемого твердого тела [1][2][3].…”
unclassified