2010
DOI: 10.1002/evan.20276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Development of the human hind limb and its importance for the evolution of bipedalism

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
53
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Upadhyay et al (1990) found no significant relationship between femoral anteversion and social class, order in family, parental age at birth, or birth presentation in children aged 2-15 years. Biomechanical forces are a primary contributing factor for the angle of anteversion during early growth and development (Tardieu, 2010;Bonneau et al, 2011). Nevertheless, generally the research supports a mechanical explanation for most of the variation in femoral torsion (LeVeau and Bernhardt, 1984;Tardieu, 2010;Bonneau et al, 2011), and Upadhyays and colleagues' (1990) results could be interpreted in this light.…”
Section: Causes Of Population Variation In Femoral Torsionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Upadhyay et al (1990) found no significant relationship between femoral anteversion and social class, order in family, parental age at birth, or birth presentation in children aged 2-15 years. Biomechanical forces are a primary contributing factor for the angle of anteversion during early growth and development (Tardieu, 2010;Bonneau et al, 2011). Nevertheless, generally the research supports a mechanical explanation for most of the variation in femoral torsion (LeVeau and Bernhardt, 1984;Tardieu, 2010;Bonneau et al, 2011), and Upadhyays and colleagues' (1990) results could be interpreted in this light.…”
Section: Causes Of Population Variation In Femoral Torsionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The fact that this ability has been maintained with increasing frequency requires the morphology of infants to allow bipedalism very early in life. This assumption does not exclude the potential influence of epigenetic factors [Tardieu, 2010]. Palaeo-anthropological studies on locomotor behaviour precursory to permanent bipedalism commonly regard hominoids as a potential model [Crompton et al, 2008[Crompton et al, , 2010.…”
Section: Infants Versus Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Da das koxale Femurende sowohl in der Evolutionsbiologie [15,30,31] wie auch in der historischen Biomechanik [12,17,22] als auch in der modernen Mechanobiologie [2,3,7,16,25,28] der meistbeachtete Abschnitt eines Röhrenknochens ist, sei als erstes und am ausführlichsten das Zusammenspiel der dort befindlichen Knorpelfugen beschrieben. Aus der Anthropologie ist bekannt, dass der reife aufrechte Gang unter anderem mit einer zunehmenden, ökonomisch vorteilhaften Spurverschmälerung einherging.…”
Section: Die Apophyse Des Trochanter Majorunclassified
“…Aus der Anthropologie ist bekannt, dass der reife aufrechte Gang unter anderem mit einer zunehmenden, ökonomisch vorteilhaften Spurverschmälerung einherging. Im Laufe der Evolution rückte das Femur immer mehr zum Körperschwerelot, was zum einen dadurch möglich wurde, dass sich am Kniegelenk ein vordem nicht existenter Valguswinkel ausbildete [30,31]. Zudem entwickelte sich, relativ spät in der Entwicklungsgeschichte, Abb.…”
Section: Die Apophyse Des Trochanter Majorunclassified